Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qlik Compose vs WhereScape RED comparison

Qlik and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0, while WhereScape is ranked #45. Qlik holds a 1.1% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.
Qlik Compose
Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews
  • 1,459 Views
  • 1,255 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
WhereScape RED
Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews
  • 1,695 Views
  • 1,356 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration tools category. WhereScape RED excels in pricing and support, while Qlik Compose stands out for its robust features.

Features: WhereScape RED automates tasks with capabilities like impact analysis and metadata-driven development, along with ease of documentation supporting methodologies such as Data Vault. Qlik Compose offers robust functionality with real-time replication, advanced data modeling, and efficient integration, making it suitable for diverse needs.

Room for Improvement: WhereScape RED could enhance performance, simplify integrations with NoSQL databases, and improve customization. Users desire better scheduler features and more comprehensive support for target databases. Qlik Compose needs stronger scheduler reliability and better automation for issue tracking, with improvements in performance for large volumes and usability for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED supports flexible deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud, receiving praise for its responsive customer service and product knowledge. Qlik Compose supports deployments mainly in on-premises and public cloud setups, with generally good customer service, though some users report mixed experiences post-sales.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED offers a cost-effective licensing model based on developer seats, achieving significant ROI through rapid development and savings in large-scale environments. Users report quick payback periods and extensive development cycle savings. Qlik Compose, while more expensive, provides value through comprehensive features with pricing influenced by data usage and enterprise requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose
Ranking in Data Integration
33rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WhereScape RED
Ranking in Data Integration
45th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy matching and reconciliation of data
The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.
Read full review
reviewer1618884 - PeerSpot reviewer
Quick to set up, flexible, and stable
The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."
"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."
"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."
"It's a stable solution."
"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."
"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."
More Qlik Compose pros
"WhereScape RED has improved our business's ability to generate needed reporting without requiring a large team of developers to manually code all of the necessary plumbing."
"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."
"This is a fantastically robust DW tool that will make you at least 10 times faster in producing a DW."
"The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code."
"It has a built-in automatic scheduling environment."
"Quickly develops a data warehouse for our organization with documentation and can track back/forward features."
"I found the initial setup very easy."
"The tool supports multiple target update methods."
More WhereScape RED pros
 

Cons

"There could be more customization options."
"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."
"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."
"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."
"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."
"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."
"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."
"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."
More Qlik Compose cons
"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."
"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."
"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."
"Technical support isn't the best."
"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."
"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it."
"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."
"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."
More WhereScape RED cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."
"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
"ROI is at least 10 times."
"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."
"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."
"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?
There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...
See all answers
What do you like most about Qlik Compose?
The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?
While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose Logo
Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose
Compared 48% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose Logo
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose
Compared 14% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose Logo
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose
Compared 12% of the time
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose Logo
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose
Compared 8% of the time
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose Logo
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose
Compared 6% of the time
More Qlik Compose Competitors
Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED Logo
Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED
Compared 15% of the time
dbt vs WhereScape RED Logo
dbt vs WhereScape RED
Compared 14% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED
Compared 12% of the time
erwin Data Catalog by Quest vs WhereScape RED Logo
erwin Data Catalog by Quest vs WhereScape RED
Compared 12% of the time
SSIS vs WhereScape RED Logo
SSIS vs WhereScape RED
Compared 12% of the time
More WhereScape RED Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose
June 2025
Qlik Compose reportDownload Qlik Compose product report
Buyer's Guide
WhereScape RED
June 2025
WhereScape RED reportDownload WhereScape RED product report
 

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose
No data available
 

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape
 

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood
British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
July 2025
Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.