We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues."
"Having the solution come from IBM you know you are receiving a product of quality in components and in the services, it is very good."
"It allows us to avoid the need for consumers to understand multiple API protocols and security arrangements, and in some circumstances can reduce the impact of systems being unavailable."
"Content is easily infiltrated in the eclipse infrastructure."
"I have found the inbound and outbound adapter confirmations valuable."
"What I like best are the monitoring features."
"We use IBM Integration Bus for document conversions."
"The most valuable feature is that it's robust and its time to market is very short."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"The installation process is easy."
"The user interface could be improved in a future release."
"There are a couple of things I want improved, but I think they have already touched upon all those things in the most recent version. I'm not using the most recent version—I use a version older than the most recent—but I'm sure that if I looked into and explored it, I would see more support on the CI/CD and more support for unit testing automation. I've read that they released all these things in the new version of App Connect. Once I explore the new version of this tool, I'll probably have a better idea of suggested improvements."
"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement."
"I would like to be able to build an Integration Bus cluster that is active-active."
"Storage capacity of the product should be addressed."
"We decided to move away from IBM Integration Bus for IT technical refreshments."
"The product lacks an integrated testing module."
"We used a third-party vendor, who help us install the solution and it was not easy."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Fiorano ESB, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB and Talend Open Studio. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.