We performed a comparison between Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the software development environment."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"The stability has been good."
"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. We are an enterprise business."
"The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The solution basically conforms to our standards."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The installation process is easy."
"The customer service executives are very responsive."
"The stability is excellent."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented."
"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."
"The web tools need to be updated."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB and Talend Open Studio. See our Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
