ProcessMaker vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ProcessMaker Logo
750 views|496 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
8,504 views|5,599 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine.""What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros →

"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes.""I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us.""The solution provides data mining and AI features.""When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio.""I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model.""Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model.""We can use workflow manager to create forms.""This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Pros →

Cons
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects.""Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

More ProcessMaker Cons →

"It is not easy to learn the product.""There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team.""I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator.""It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient.""Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows.""I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas.""One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process.""Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."
  • "My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."
  • "I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."
  • "I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."
  • "SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."
  • "This solution provides really great value for the money."
  • "We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."
  • "Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."
  • More SAP Signavio Process Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a… more »
    Top Answer:The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand… more »
    Top Answer:We have a yearly basis license. We don't find it too expensive for our use case. It helps us harmonize processes and those processes result in significant effort saving, then the product is paid for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    750
    Comparisons
    496
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    8,504
    Comparisons
    5,599
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
    Signavio Process Editor
    Learn More
    SAP
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

    The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

    Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

    Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

    Sample Customers
    Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
    DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.