We performed a comparison between Pipedream and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."
"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."
"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."
"The solution enables users to integrate several things."
"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"There are a lot of tools to help the manager. WSO2 is very easy to install. It has all the principal functionalities that you think about when you want to put up the management solution. It's a very friendly tool."
"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."
"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
"It's a good product."
"We faced some server timeouts."
"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."
"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."
"They should give more information about trigger failure."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"I would like it to be a more stable solution. Maybe in the last version that is approved. For me it would be good if they had a community established version."
"We found WSO2 API Manager to be a bit complex."
"WSO2 API Manager could increase their security compliance."
"Basically, mTLS is a certificate-based communication protocol that WSO2 API Manager doesn't support."
"I would like it to be a more convenient development platform with the ability to write orchestrations and so on. Our problem with this product is that in my country, we are the only enterprise that has been using this product. We're missing a lot of knowledge from colleagues to consult with, and we also aren't able to recruit people with relevant skills. It is a big problem. The small team that is maintaining this product is the only team that can actually relate to any technical issue. The support that we're getting from the company is not great. There is also a cultural gap there because they're from Sri Lanka, and it is not easy. They're putting in a lot of effort, but they are not meeting our expectations."
Pipedream is ranked 18th in API Management with 4 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. Pipedream is rated 9.0, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pipedream writes " A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". Pipedream is most compared with , whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our Pipedream vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
