We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and WSO2 API Manager based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Many users are heavily invested in Microsoft Azure products, making Microsoft Azure API Management more widely used and trusted. Additionally, WSO2 API lacks some new features and updated functionalities that other API solutions commonly provide. In terms of pricing, however, users are happier with WSO2.
"The Application Gateway we have found to be the most useful in Microsoft Azure API Management. We have integrated the Microsoft Azure API Management with Application Gateway. Application Gateway is a type of load balancer that we are using for the high availability of our API calls."
"Easy to integrate API management platform. It is a stable and scalable solution."
"Microsoft Azure API Management is 90 to 99 percent scalable. We have three instances running in parallel."
"The ability to easily connect back to Service Fabric is the most important for us."
"We're very satisfied with Azure API Management. We've had no issues with bugs, everything runs smoothly, and the connection between the cloud and the on-premise infrastructure was good."
"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."
"The most valuable features are the API and integrations."
"The stability and performance are good. It is easy to install, and it scales well too."
"The user interface is easy to navigate, and the documentation is extensive. It's open-source, so everything is available, and we can create what we need. That's not necessarily a feature, but it's an advantage."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"It's a good product."
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"WSO2 API Manager is a stable solution."
"The product is easy to use."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
"The solution is stable."
"Some of the DevOps stuff could be easier to work with. The migration paths are a little complicated, and moving code around could be more seamless. There should be less manual migration when several teams work together to publish code to the DevOps."
"I would like to see more security features become available."
"The licensing tiers can be misleading."
"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."
"Microsoft Azure API Management is lagging behind Apigee and should also have a better CICD process."
"Specific to API development, I think Microsoft is still far behind AWS. AWS has grown by leaps and bounds, and Microsoft is a close second. But in terms of features and other stuff they provide, Microsoft's compatibility with publicly available APIs is a little limited. So, that is a little bit of a constraint. But what they provide is good, it's just that they need to build more on their API suite. I think Google is doing a really good job at that."
"I rate the technical support from Microsoft Azure API Management a four out of five."
"Microsoft Azure API Management needs to improve stability."
"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"They are developing another platform called Choreo that allows you to create API itself using the WSO2 programming language Ballerina. It would be great if they added a direct connection between Choreo and API Manager, that would be great. I think they are working on that, but I'm not sure."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"I would improve the product documentation. There are some gaps, and it can be difficult to find the proper documentation for the product if you need to solve something."
"We had some problems with the reverse proxy not being able to invoke fully qualified domain names, so we have to build some custom scripts to solve this issue."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 39 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 8.0, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Easy to set up with good access control but support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes " A tool that serves as a gateway to support and monitor an organization's services that need to make upgrades easier". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Enterprise and SwaggerHub, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, 3scale API Management and IBM API Connect. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.