Amazon API Gateway and WSO2 API Manager compete in the API management category. Amazon API Gateway seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration with AWS services, appealing to users who heavily rely on the AWS ecosystem.
Features: Amazon API Gateway offers robust API management, seamless AWS integration with services like Lambda and IAM, and comprehensive security features against SQL injection and cross-site scripting. It is highly scalable and user-friendly, making it cost-effective for high workloads. WSO2 API Manager is valued for its open-source nature, high customizability, and strong API management lifecycle. It supports containerized solutions, allowing flexible and extendable implementations. The API Store for developers enhances publication and security features.
Room for Improvement: Amazon API Gateway is criticized for its high costs and complex configurations, requiring in-depth AWS knowledge. There is a demand for better documentation, real-time monitoring, improved pricing for high data volumes, and enhancements to the user interface and governance features. WSO2 API Manager goes through complexity with patchy technical support and requires better documentation. Its pricing and licensing can be confusing, despite being open-source, and additional integrations alongside a simplified user experience would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon API Gateway is primarily used in public cloud environments, integrating smoothly within the AWS ecosystem, supporting its choice for AWS projects. Customer service is generally good but some users have experienced delays. WSO2 API Manager is used on-premises and in private clouds, featuring a different deployment model. Support is strong but the product's complexity suggests a need for clearer documentation and user assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon API Gateway uses a pay-as-you-go model, which can be economical but may become costly with high data volumes. It is considered to offer good value for integration, security, and deployment ease. WSO2 API Manager provides cost-effective solutions due to its open-source model. However, the complex pricing structure poses challenges. It can be more affordable than enterprise solutions, though costs may escalate depending on features required. Both solutions offer ROI tailored to varying budgets and deployment needs.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
We benefit from enterprise support, ensuring prompt responses from the technical support team.
The support is good, with well-defined documentation and helpful blogs.
We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute.
I haven't observed any significant issues indicating a lack of scalability, as it can be efficiently managed through configurations.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
The stability is highly guaranteed, as AWS itself provides the cloud service with a reliability of 99.99%.
The system is stable for our low-concurrency use cases.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
Although I find AWS API Gateway better than Oracle in many aspects, the network connectivity challenges force us to consider using Oracle API Gateway for our new product, LOS (Load Origination System).
Amazon API Gateway needs to focus on minimizing latency.
Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
The product's capabilities for integrating with REST APIs are valuable.
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.
It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.
With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
