Pico Corvil Analytics vs ScienceLogic comparison

PICO and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. PICO is ranked #73, while ScienceLogic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7. PICO holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PICO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,486 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
2,104 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and Pico Corvil Analytics are competing solutions in network performance monitoring. Based on data comparisons, ScienceLogic holds an advantage in pricing and ease of deployment, whereas Pico Corvil Analytics offers superior features justifying its higher price point.

Features: ScienceLogic offers dynamic network mapping, extensive cloud integration capabilities, and automated infrastructure management. Pico Corvil Analytics provides advanced real-time data acquisition and analysis systems, comprehensive network traffic insights, and sophisticated anomaly detection features.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its data analysis depth, improve user interface customization, and expand automated troubleshooting capabilities. Pico Corvil Analytics could benefit from more straightforward deployment options, streamlined user interface, and lower initial pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a straightforward deployment process with robust customer support, suitable for organizations with limited IT resources. Pico Corvil Analytics involves a more complex setup but offers highly effective analysis tools and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is competitively priced with tangible ROI through efficient network operations management. Pico Corvil Analytics, although more expensive upfront, delivers significant ROI with its advanced data analysis capabilities, valuable for detailed network analysis requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.1%
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"As part of my role in monitoring multiple client connections, I would use Pico Corvil Analytics to set up alerts for performance issues, such as TCP resends and dropped packets. These alerts would trigger when the volume was low and performance was poor, allowing me to work with our trading partners to find a resolution. I would present them with the statistics I had and together, we would identify the source of the issue. This collaboration resulted in the client often reconfiguring their systems. For example, we may find that a network connection needed to be made. Overall, this proactive approach helped to maintain strong connections with our clients and minimize disruptions to trading revenue."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"Power packs."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"It is simple."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"The analytics feature is very nice, but it's mostly software. We are hoping that it could be embedded in ASICs, so it could be faster."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

46%

Computer Software Company

10%

Non Profit

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

January 2026

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

January 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

Corvil

No data available

Overview

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

Free Report: Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pico Corvil Analytics vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.