IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Parasoft SOAtest vs Seeker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
4,687 views|2,873 comparisons
Synopsys Logo
166 views|64 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
Top Answer:From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
Top Answer:We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
4,687
Comparisons
2,873
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
458
Rating
7.0
Views
166
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn More
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Seeker
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Comms Service Provider28%
University5%
Construction Company3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: June 2022.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 19th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while Seeker is ranked 33rd in Application Security Testing (AST). Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, Coverity, SoapUI Pro and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Seeker is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.