Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Seeker Interactive comparison

Checkmarx and Black Duck are both solutions in the API Security category. Checkmarx is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Black Duck is ranked #23. Checkmarx holds a 5.9% mindshare in APIS, compared to Black Duck’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.
Checkmarx One
Read 71 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 18,550 Views
  • 371 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Seeker Interactive
Read 1 Seeker Interactive review
  • 727 Views
  • 80 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 15, 2025

Checkmarx One and Seeker Interactive are competing in the application security testing market. Checkmarx One has the upper hand with its extensive support and customer satisfaction, while Seeker Interactive offers unique features that provide more value for its price.

Features: Checkmarx One provides a comprehensive suite of tools for static and open-source testing, deep integration capabilities, and scalability. Seeker Interactive focuses on dynamic and interactive testing with real-time analysis, emphasizes feedback during code execution, and offers unique features for price value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment and robust customer support, suitable for various CI/CD pipelines. Seeker Interactive emphasizes a straightforward deployment process with quick integration and a streamlined user experience, focusing on ease of integration and guided support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its feature set and integration abilities, offering higher ROI for large operations. Seeker Interactive has a lower setup cost, delivering quicker ROI through real-time assessment and vulnerability management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: October 2025).
Buyer's Guide
API Security
October 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in API Security
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (22nd), Container Security (23rd), Static Code Analysis (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), DevSecOps (5th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)
Seeker Interactive
Ranking in API Security
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (19th), Mobile Threat Defense (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 5.9%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeker Interactive is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Checkmarx One5.9%
Seeker Interactive1.0%
Other93.1%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup
In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.
Read full review
San K - PeerSpot reviewer
More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities
One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need. The purposes for which applications are designed may differ in practice in the industry, and because of this, there will always be tools that sometimes report false positives. Thus, there should be some means with which I can customize the way that Seeker learns about our applications, possibly by using some kind of AI / ML capability within the tool that will automatically reduce the number of false positives that we get as we use the tool over time. Obviously, when we first start using the scanning tool there will be false positives, but as it keeps going and as I keep using the tool, there should be a period of time where either the application can learn how to ignore false positives, or I can customize it do so. Adding this type of functionality would definitely prevent future issues when it comes to reporting false positives, and this is a key area that we have already asked the vendor to improve on, in general. On a different note, there is one feature that isn't completely available right now where you can integrate Seeker with an open-source vulnerability scanner or composition analysis tool such as Black Duck. I would very much like this capability to be available to us out-of-the-box, so that we can easily integrate with tools like Black Duck in such a way that any open source components that are used in the front-end are easily identified. I think this would be a huge plus for Seeker. Another feature within Seeker which could benefit from improvement is active verification, which lets you actively verify a vulnerability. This feature currently doesn't work in certain applications, particularly in scenarios where you have requested tokens. When we bought the tool, we didn't realize this and we were not told about it by the vendor, so initially it was a big challenge for us to overcome it and properly begin our deployment.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."
"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
More Checkmarx One pros
"A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan, Micro Focus Fortify, etc. Furthermore, with Seeker, we are finding more and more valid (i.e. "true") positives over time compared with the dynamic scanners."
 

Cons

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."
"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
More Checkmarx One cons
"One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."
"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."
"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."
"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."
More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice
"The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Government
17%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise38
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One
Compared 45% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One Logo
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One
Compared 6% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
Coverity Static vs Seeker Interactive Logo
Coverity Static vs Seeker Interactive
Compared 42% of the time
Contrast Security Assess vs Seeker Interactive Logo
Contrast Security Assess vs Seeker Interactive
Compared 40% of the time
More Seeker Interactive Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
October 2025
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
Buyer's Guide
Internet Security
October 2025
Seeker Interactive reportDownload Seeker Interactive product report
 

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx
Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.
Black Duck
 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
Buyer's Guide
API Security
October 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, Imperva, Salt Security and others in API Security. Updated: October 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.