We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"It is stable."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."
"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."
"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."
"The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."
"I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process."
"For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella."
"The web tools need to be updated."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
