Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FioranoMQ vs Red Hat Fuse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FioranoMQ
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (18th)
Red Hat Fuse
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. FioranoMQ is designed for Message Queue (MQ) Software and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Red Hat Fuse, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 7.0% mindshare, down 7.4% since last year.
Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
FioranoMQ0.2%
IBM MQ25.5%
ActiveMQ25.1%
Other49.2%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Fuse7.0%
IBM Integration Bus20.4%
Mule ESB17.6%
Other55.0%
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Use FioranoMQ?
Share your opinion
Kaushal Kedia - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a single console for all applications and supports Camel routing
Containerization is one key area where the product can improve, but it probably has already improved in JBOS integration. On a few occasions, our company's production team faced an issue with Red Hat Fuse; the screen displayed that the containers had gone down while, in reality, they were running in the background. The user interface and the back-end code were not in sync in the aforementioned situation, which our organization frequently faced while using Red Hat Fuse. But at our company, we were using an older version of Red Hat Fuse in which we faced the issues. From the JBOS end, the product was very frequently changed from Red Hat, and it was difficult for our clients to keep investing money in every upgrade. Six or seven years back, Red Hat Fuse was one of the best solutions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?
Containerization is one key area where the product can improve, but it probably has already improved in JBOS integration. On a few occasions, our company's production team faced an issue with Red H...
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Fuse?
Our company used Red Hat Fuse to integrate layers of numerous applications. The solution has also been used in our organization for orchestration purposes of multiple microservices over the years. ...
What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Fuse?
I would rate Red Hat Fuse as eight out of ten. When the solution was being used in our organization, the JBoss or Red Hat support was great. The solution was highly stable, robust, and scalable, an...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IG Index, UC Berkeley, Schlumberger Oil Fields, Credit Agricole Titres, FairEx International Financial Systems Ptv Ltd, FinScope, Large Hedge Fund, LiquidityHub, Scottrade, Thomas Weisel Partners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commission Junction, Connect First, Flytxt, Xylo, Wireless Matrix Corp, Korea Telecom, Qwest Communications
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2025.
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.