Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FioranoMQ vs Red Hat Fuse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FioranoMQ
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (19th)
Red Hat Fuse
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. FioranoMQ is designed for Message Queue (MQ) Software and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Red Hat Fuse, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 7.0% mindshare, down 7.3% since last year.
Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
FioranoMQ0.3%
IBM MQ22.9%
ActiveMQ22.7%
Other54.1%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Fuse7.0%
IBM Integration Bus17.7%
Mule ESB15.4%
Other59.9%
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Use FioranoMQ?
Leave a review
Luis Arce - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Long-term integrations have improved performance and support critical business processes
The downsides of Red Hat Fuse that I encountered were related to the Java virtual machine I worked with, which was Oracle, as the client did not create good services. In the integration, they had many steps with a loop and several bad uses of the integration with many steps and a bad pattern of design. That was the problem, and then I resolved that. The user interface is not good, and it is a very technical tool. In comparison with other tools such as Oracle Integration Cloud or Oracle BPEL, Red Hat Fuse is more complex. However, the integration in low code is more simple because there is the possibility to create services directly in Java and call them at a high level from Apache Camel and expose them with Red Hat Fuse.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Fuse?
I think the pricing for Red Hat Fuse is okay; it's not expensive, and the support is good.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?
The downsides of Red Hat Fuse that I encountered were related to the Java virtual machine I worked with, which was Oracle, as the client did not create good services. In the integration, they had m...
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Fuse?
My use cases for Red Hat Fuse include using Drools to create a bunch of rules for the Finance Ministry in Chile many years ago. I worked with another enterprise named Aguas Andinas, which is a very...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IG Index, UC Berkeley, Schlumberger Oil Fields, Credit Agricole Titres, FairEx International Financial Systems Ptv Ltd, FinScope, Large Hedge Fund, LiquidityHub, Scottrade, Thomas Weisel Partners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commission Junction, Connect First, Flytxt, Xylo, Wireless Matrix Corp, Korea Telecom, Qwest Communications
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.