"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."
"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."
"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."
"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
Oracle Access Manager is ranked 15th in Access Management with 3 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 5th in Customer Identity and Access Management with 3 reviews. Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Integrates well into an Oracle ecosystem, it's easy to use, but the support and setup could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "Easy to implement with good customization capabilities and good security". Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, IBM Security Access Manager and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0, Amazon Cognito, SailPoint IdentityIQ and IBM Security Access Manager. See our Oracle Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
