Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server comparison

Okta and WSO2 are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Okta is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while WSO2 is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Okta holds a 16.1% mindshare in CIaA, compared to WSO2’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Auth0 Platform

Read 19 Auth0 Platform reviews

4,690 Views
1,876 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

WSO2 Identity Server

Read 11 WSO2 Identity Server reviews

862 Views
233 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auth0 Platform

WSO2 Identity Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Auth0 Platform and WSO2 Identity Server are strong contenders in identity management. Auth0 is favored for cloud integration and advanced security, while WSO2 delivers flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Auth0 has an edge with its cloud adaptability and sophisticated security, whereas WSO2 shines with its open-source model and customization potential.

Features: Auth0 offers multifactor authentication, scalability, and compliance with certifications like GDPR and ISO. It allows rich social media integration and customization using rules and pipelines. WSO2 Identity Server provides robust single sign-on and seamless integration with Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP. Its open-source flexibility supports tailored identity management solutions.

Room for Improvement: Auth0 users look for improved authorization, better multi-tenancy, and clearer pricing. WSO2 Identity Server needs enhanced documentation, user-friendliness, and better high-availability architecture. Both platforms have room to refine pricing strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auth0 excels in cloud deployment, offering rapid integration and highly rated technical support. WSO2 supports hybrid and on-premise setups but experiences occasional support continuity issues. Auth0's technical support provides a notable advantage for users seeking quick resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: Auth0's premium cost is justified by its scalable and secure offerings, though its pricing model can confuse enterprises. It shows substantial ROI against in-house solutions. WSO2 offers competitive pricing with its open-source framework, delivering value for businesses managing their infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auth0 Platform

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Access Management (5th), AI IT Support (6th)

WSO2 Identity Server

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Auth0 Platform is 16.1%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Identity Server is 1.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Auth0	16.1%
WSO2 Identity Server	1.3%
Other	82.6%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

Vishal Chopade

Senior Software Engineer at Charter Communications

Secure API access for enterprises has improved and provides dynamic authentication for users

The best features Auth0 offers are its scalability and it is a better way of authenticating a user compared to just a tokenized version of authentication where the token is static and does not offer dynamic authentication compared to how Auth0 offers it. While working in a dynamic environment where there are many enterprises involved in the service, you need a tool that can authenticate them on the go, which is why I like it. Auth0 has positively impacted my organization. Previously we used the tokenized version of authentication. The work was simple, but when you push this code to deployment and enterprises are involved, it makes much more sense to authenticate them through Auth0 so that you can just get a login for yourself when you are authenticated, which helps to dynamically scale depending on the product and its viability. The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Utilizing key management and seamless single sign-on integration for enhanced user profile management

WSO2 Identity Server's key management feature stands out as a particularly impactful feature for enhancing security. Additionally, from a user perspective, the self-user portal and user profile management capabilities are highly valuable. It allows users to manage their profiles, change passwords, and offers a self-care portal type of functionality. The single sign-on capability integrates seamlessly with various platforms, including Google, Facebook, LDAP, and Active Directory, which supports rapid product launches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."

"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."

"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."

"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."

"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."

"Auth0 has the best support ever."

"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."

"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."

More Auth0 Platform pros

"Comprehensive ecosystem."

"I am completely satisfied with WSO2 Identity Server and would definitely recommend it to other companies."

"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."

"We use the solution for customer identity management, authenticating customers coming in through a web portal."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."

"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."

"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."

More WSO2 Identity Server pros

Cons

"The pricing should be lower. A reduction of 20-25% would be great."

"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"

"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."

"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."

"Better documentation for Salesforce integration is suggested."

"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."

"If you’re not a developer, you need to spend time exploring more."

"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."

More Auth0 Platform cons

"The solution's licensing model could be more flexible, and pricing could be improved."

"The solution seems to be pretty outdated."

"I found the initial setup to be very complex."

"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The high availability architecture has to be improved."

"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."

"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."

More WSO2 Identity Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."

"It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."

"There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."

"The tool is cheaper compared to competing solutions. Those alternatives tended to be more expensive. Consequently, Okta purchased it because it was considerably cheaper. The solution even offered some free services while still providing excellent functionality."

"I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."

"We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers."

"WSO2 Identity Server is not an expensive solution."

"They should bring in some good pricing models to host the marketplace."

"I rate the product price an eight out of ten. There is a need to pay more for the extra features provided by the solution."

"At this time we are working with the open-source version."

"I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Transportation Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auth0?

It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?

The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auth0?

I do not think there are any improvements needed for Auth0, other than maybe making it more visible to beginners. Auth0 could be made more accessible to beginners.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Identity Server?

The pricing is currently the same as the API Manager, so it's not surprising. Since we used it primarily for SSO and the self portal, there were no additional pricing concerns.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Identity Server?

Currently, all required features are supported. If new use cases for artificial intelligence arise, it could be beneficial to incorporate those. However, for our current projects, WSO2 Identity Ser...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 Identity Server?

We deployed WSO2 Identity Server to fulfill our single sign-on (SSO) requirements. Whenever we implement the API Manager, instead of using the API Manager's inbuilt key manager, we use WSO2 Identit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Okta Platform vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra External ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Identity vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Auth0 Platform Competitors

Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 15% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 14% of the time

Ilex Meibo Identity Management vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 9% of the time

More WSO2 Identity Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform

December 2025

Download Auth0 Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Identity Server

December 2025

Download WSO2 Identity Server product report

Overview

Auth0 Platform utilizes JWT-based authentication and supports over 30 social logins, enabling integration with various codebases. Known for robust security, compliance, and scalability, it's tailored for enterprises needing customizable, efficient authentication solutions.

Auth0 Platform is a comprehensive identity management system used for customer, business-to-business, and API authentication across cloud infrastructures like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It simplifies user logins and identity management with features like Single Sign-On, identity federation, and multi-tenancy. Enterprises rely on it for its dynamic authentication capabilities and efficient management of user roles. However, areas for enhancement include authorization features, flexible pricing for small developers, and enhanced documentation for machine-to-machine authentication. Improving multi-tenancy support and customizable login experiences could elevate its appeal.

What are the key features of Auth0 Platform?

JWT-Based Authentication: Simplifies infrastructure with secure token-based access.
Social Logins: Supports over 30 social platforms for seamless user experiences.
Customizability: Tailors authentication flows to meet enterprise specifications.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds layers of security to authentication processes.
API Integration: Facilitates robust connections between applications and services.
User-Friendly Documentation: Provides clear guidance for developers implementing Auth0 features.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Auth0?

Scalability: Handles growth while maintaining performance.
Security Compliance: Meets multiple regulatory requirements with ease.
Integration Flexibility: Adapts to diverse environments and codebases.
Enhanced User Management: Offers tools for efficient user role handling.
Dynamic Authentication Processes: Accommodates varying enterprise authentication needs.

In industries deploying Auth0 Platform, such as cloud-based service providers and enterprises using API-driven architectures, its implementation focuses on secure and seamless user logins. Many leverage its readiness for scaling authentication processes and its extensibility, including support for Single Sign-On and identity federation, to create streamlined user experiences across businesses. Expanding multi-factor authentication beyond traditional methods and refining social login integrations are common approaches to address specific industry needs.

Okta

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

WSO2

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota

Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server

December 2025

Free Report: Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auth0 Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.