No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
WSO2 Identity Server Logo

WSO2 Identity Server Reviews

Vendor: WSO2
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is WSO2 Identity Server?

WSO2 Identity Server is recognized for its comprehensive ecosystem, providing essential management tools and supporting seamless integrations with major platforms and APIs for secure and customized user access.

Get the WSO2 Identity Server Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about WSO2 Identity Server, Okta Platform, Ping Identity Platform and more!
WSO2 Identity Server is the #10 ranked solution in top Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions. PeerSpot users give WSO2 Identity Server an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. WSO2 Identity Server is most commonly compared to Okta Platform: WSO2 Identity Server vs Okta Platform. WSO2 Identity Server is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 47% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 Identity Server
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 892,776 peers since 2012

Featured WSO2 Identity Server reviews

Read more reviews

WSO2 Identity Server mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of WSO2 Identity Server in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category stands at 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WSO2 Identity Server2.8%
Okta Platform15.2%
Auth0 Platform13.1%
Other68.9%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

PeerResearch reports based on WSO2 Identity Server reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCustomer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)May 5, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 5, 2026Download
ComparisonWSO2 Identity Server vs Okta PlatformMay 5, 2026Download
ComparisonWSO2 Identity Server vs Auth0 PlatformMay 5, 2026Download
ComparisonWSO2 Identity Server vs Ping Identity PlatformMay 5, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Okta Platform4.315.2%96%109 interviewsAdd to research
Ping Identity Platform4.27.9%100%30 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

WSO2 Identity Server's crucial features include single sign-on, role-based permissions, seamless API integration, comprehensive ecosystem, and robust security. Users value the passwordless technology, Active Directory and LDAP connection, user management and customization capabilities. The self-user portal enhances user experience, while the key management feature bolsters security. API integrations cater to diverse systems, allowing customer identity management and user authentication to be effective and efficient.
  • "The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
  • "Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On, and overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
  • "I use this solution to generate keystores and certifications and link these with project development in our company."

Room for Improvement

WSO2 Identity Server could enhance its high availability architecture and simplify LDAP synchronization. Users want a simpler configuration process and improved documentation. Communication glitches between microservices need resolution. Users find pricing high and seek competitive models. Multi-factor authentication and integration require enhancement. Licensing should be more flexible, and a user-friendly interface is desired. Enhanced connectors for on-premise versions and integration of new AI use cases are also needed. Users prefer better marketplace availability.
  • "Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
  • "This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally."
  • "This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."

Pricing

WSO2 Identity Server is open source, making it initially free, but enterprises often opt for a yearly support license, which is competitively priced and cost-effective compared to other identity managers like MuleSoft or TIBCO. Users appreciate the robust features without incurring unexpected costs beyond standard licensing fees. There are two licensing options: Apache for self-build and WSO2 purchase. Support is deemed valuable, with pricing rated moderately favorable by users.
  • "I rate the product price an eight out of ten. There is a need to pay more for the extra features provided by the solution."
  • "WSO2 Identity Server is not an expensive solution."
  • "They should bring in some good pricing models to host the marketplace."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily utilize WSO2 Identity Server for ensuring secure connectivity and synchronization with LDAP servers, enabling single sign-on (SSO) and role-based access. They evaluate identity solutions for their clients, particularly in retail, to integrate components like API Manager and Enterprise Integrator. It's employed for generating keystores, certifications, Python Auth, and API management, providing security and access control for applications. Companies prefer its key manager functionalities when deploying API Manager.

Service and Support

Customers find WSO2 Identity Server's support effective, knowledgeable, and responsive. Technical support is praised, with assistance provided in resolving issues like database connectivity. The open-source community is valuable, yet documentation may be complex. Many choose the subscription for better service since the open-source version's support model is lacking. Their technical team is highly rated, responding swiftly to tickets. While overall support experiences are positive, enhancing documentation is suggested.

Deployment

Users found the initial setup of WSO2 Identity Server varied in complexity. Some experienced a straightforward process taking a few hours or days, while others faced challenges, especially in cloud-native environments. LDAP setup and API integration posed issues for some, and additional support and documentation were suggested. Implementation time ranged from a few days to two weeks, depending on expertise. Customization and maintenance required team efforts, typically involving two to five members.

Scalability

WSO2 Identity Server exhibits strong scalability, supporting hundreds of thousands of users across various projects. Companies find it suitable for both small integrations and larger customer bases. It integrates well with platforms like Kubernetes and handles high user volumes effectively. Scalability ratings range high among users, often reaching eight to ten out of ten. Organizations emphasize the importance of managing core volume and system resources to optimize scalability potential.

Stability

Users rate WSO2 Identity Server's stability highly, with ratings of eight or nine out of ten. They appreciate its maturity, lack of crashes, and its ability to handle large data volumes effectively. Some mention the presence of bugs in the open-source version's initial release, but consider it stable in recent versions. They praise its comprehensive ecosystem and quality documentation, though some feel they haven't fully explored its capabilities to provide a perfect rating.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our WSO2 Identity Server Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise41
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Transportation Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
University
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Government
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Retailer
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Insurance Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare WSO2 Identity Server with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about WSO2 Identity Server

WSO2 Identity Server serves as a robust identity management solution, delivering strong single sign-on capabilities and role-based permissions. It integrates smoothly with prominent platforms such as Google, Active Directory, and LDAP. Known for its passwordless technology and customization potential, WSO2 simplifies API and IT server component integration to meet authentication needs effectively. Despite some challenges in installation, documentation, and licensing flexibility, it remains a strong contender in identity management, particularly for environments needing LDAP and extensive API interaction.

What are the key features of WSO2 Identity Server?
  • Comprehensive ecosystem: Provides key management and user profile management.
  • Single Sign-On (SSO): Supports platforms like Google and Active Directory.
  • Role-based permissions: Offers impactful permission management.
  • Passwordless technology: Enhances security and user convenience.
  • API integration: Seamlessly integrates with external user sources and APIs.
What benefits should users look for in WSO2 reviews?
  • Enhanced security: Through robust authentication and access controls.
  • Flexibility: Supports diverse platforms and APIs.
  • Customization potential: Adapts to specific requirements and user interactions.
  • Efficiency and simplicity: Streamlined integration with IT components.

In retail and API management, WSO2 Identity Server is employed for identity solutions and meeting SSO requirements. Users in these industries leverage its key management capabilities and integrate with Active Directory to enhance access control. Retailers and developers utilize WSO2 for secure API interactions and project development, evaluating it alongside other security solutions like Okta.

WSO2 Identity Server customers

Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360

Related questions

  • 84
Looking for an Identity and Access Management product for an energy and utility organization
  • 64
What are some tips for effective identity and access management to prevent insider data breaches?
  • 93
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 107
What are your best practices for Identity and Access Management (IAM) in the Cloud?
  • 77
What access management tools would you recommend to help with GDPR compliance?
  • 80
How to convince a client that Identity and Access Management (IdAM) is essential for risk elimination?
  • 55
What advice do you have for an enterprise user on Password Day 2021?
  • 141
How is Zero Trust different from the Least Privileged model?
  • 187
What are the best practices to prevent a Brute Force attack via remote access?
  • 133
What is the difference between SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 compliance?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server
Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server
Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server
ForgeRock vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
ForgeRock vs WSO2 Identity Server
Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs WSO2 Identity Server
See all alternatives
 
WSO2 Identity Server Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise5.0We chose WSO2 Identity Server for its robust SSO capabilities and enhanced key management features, which improve security and integrate seamlessly with platforms like Google and Facebook. Compared to Keycloak, it offers better integration with API gateway products, meeting all our current needs.
Doctoral Researcher at National Chengchi University4.5I use WSO2 Identity Server for Python authentication in my company. Its API integration is valuable, but pricing and multi-factor authentication need improvement. It provides significant time savings for online customers, though integration challenges exist. We previously used Auth0.
Software Engineer at University of Peradeniya4.5I found WSO2 Identity Server effective as it handles configuration well. However, it feels outdated, and the pricing could be improved. I didn't explore other solutions, and there was no specific cloud provider mentioned.
Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer at Asante Digital Group3.5I use WSO2 Identity Server for customer identity management and single sign-on through Active Directory. While it's effective, its licensing model and pricing could be more flexible. I've also worked with DataPower, SailPoint, and ForgeRock before.
Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees3.5We use WSO2 Identity Server for API management, benefiting from its easy integration with IT server components. However, it needs marketplace availability, competitive pricing, and better service compared to Kong. We also considered alternatives like Akamai and Kong.
Project Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.5I use WSO2 Identity Server for guaranteed SSO, finding its AD/LDAP integration, stability, and scalability excellent. Customer service is good, and setup easy. I recommend better source code documentation. I rate it 9/10.
Enterprise Architect at Peristent Systems3.5I found WSO2 easy to integrate for SSO and competitively priced for small organizations. However, it lacks integrated BPM/auditing and has limited scalability, requiring external connectors, despite good support.
Senior Technical Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I find the solution stable, easy to implement, and cost-effective, with valuable features like passwordless tech. However, documentation needs improving, especially for cloud setups, and the developer experience could be simplified.