OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Cloud Service Automation and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is.""The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pros →

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.""Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.""I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Cons →

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use.""Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."
  • More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.
    Top Answer:OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.
    Top Answer:My organization uses the enterprise server solution, Micro Focus, on Azure. We are working on a project to migrate a mainframe code to the micro-enterprise developer on Azure, submitting our JCL jobs… more »
    Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
    Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    272
    Comparisons
    199
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    29th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    26
    Comparisons
    10
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
    Serverless360
    Learn More
    Kovai.co
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

    Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

    Our Core features:

    1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
    2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
    3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
    4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
    5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
      Sample Customers
      China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
      MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm20%
      Manufacturing Company16%
      Computer Software Company13%
      Recreational Facilities/Services Company7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company39%
      Manufacturing Company15%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Real Estate/Law Firm5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business14%
      Large Enterprise86%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business20%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise64%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise7%
      Large Enterprise57%
      Buyer's Guide
      OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

      See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.