OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs xMatters comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OnSolve and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. OnSolve is ranked #19, while Everbridge is ranked #12. OnSolve holds a 1.8% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Everbridge users are willing to recommend the solution.

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Read 1 OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management review

1,861 Views
800 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

3,532 Views
3,143 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and xMatters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, SolarWinds and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Alerting and Incident Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

19th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mass Notification Software (2nd), Critical Event Management (CEM) (5th)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is 1.8%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.4%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
xMatters	4.4%
OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management	1.8%
Other	93.8%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

it_user826692

Business Continuity Specialist at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location, but the user interface is too complicated

Emergency alerting for a global company in 14 countries It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location. It has the same general functions as most emergency alerting systems. The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful. The user interface is…

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful."

"It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location."

"The Flow Designer is quite valuable, as you can set up integrations and flows without necessarily needing to know about code."

"After implementing the solution and updating the groups/on-call list we have seen a huge volume of increase in the Time of React, which helps us to alert the right resources within a fraction of seconds (after the alert is generated) and allows for quick notification and a faster restoration process."

"Its ease of use and self-service are important to me. It's very easy for users to go in and modify their own contact information, for managers to go in and manage their own on-call rotations and shifts."

"Allows us to define scenarios that notify only the necessary people when we need to open a conference bridge."

"xMatters is helpful for getting the right on-call resources. That is a key factor. It is also very user-friendly, and just a little documentation helps you to understand things such as how on-calls are configured, how groups are configured, and how users update their on-call devices."

"The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the entire alert notification configuration, having an external system to trigger events that will process the alert to the supporting team. If a system is down, then you need to get it attention. Sometimes, it cannot wait until the next day. Therefore, how xMatters provides this type of integration is critical."

"Since I've been here, problems get resolved faster because of xMatters' automated notifications and the ease of use, people can send out notifications and get together faster to solve problems."

"It reduces the amount of oversight required, and consequently, the amount of time to assign and get a response on a ticket."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"Conference calling requires a complicated syntax formula."

"The user interface is too complicated and aspects that should be offered, such as email subject line editing, are not."

"Unfortunately, we have no way to prevent people from choosing not to receive that level of notification."

"The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes."

"Some of the workflow development work that we do for the in-house piece can be quite complicated if you don't have experience using the tool."

"A lot of the issues that we've had have already been addressed. However, they could be clearer with the actual throughput and the costs. The throughput that we signed up for was a lot lower than what we needed, and we had to pay a lot more to get the throughput that we needed."

"While they do have an extensive library of integrations, sometimes those integrations or custom integrations, require a more technical level of expertise in products outside of xMatters, such as Java."

"An additional knowledge-sharing program could be helpful and part of the demo workshops (right now, these only provide partial information)."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It seemed comparable or more reasonable than some of the other solutions, at least when we evaluated it. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. Its cost is good, given the breadth of features provided by xMatters."

"I do not think it is worth the value."

"This is a subscription-based, SaaS solution."

"The pricing and licensing are okay. I wish that the user licenses were cheaper but the stakeholder licenses are at a reasonable cost."

"I know roughly what we pay per year. For what we use it for and what its purpose is, it is very valuable."

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"You pay for the user, not the number of alerts. Therefore, xMatters provides a better ROI, if you can leverage it for notifications based on alerts from other monitoring tools. "

"The features they provide, versus the cost, are pretty good."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

Everbridge Mass Notification vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 26% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 14% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 10% of the time

Rave Alert vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 9% of the time

Blackberry AtHoc vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 2% of the time

More OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 25% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 14% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 14% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 7% of the time

BigPanda vs xMatters

Compared 3% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

November 2026

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management report

Download OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

October 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

Send Word Now, OnSolve MIR3, OnSolve CodeRED, OnSolve SmartNotice, OnSolve TelAlert

xMatters IT Management

Overview

The OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management provides data-driven insights and communication solutions to effectively manage and mitigate risks in rapidly changing environments.

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management helps organizations anticipate, respond to, and recover from critical events. With real-time analytics, automated alerting, and robust security protocols, it empowers decision-makers to act swiftly and efficiently. The platform integrates with existing systems to enhance risk management strategies and ensure continuous operations even during disruptions. Its scalable architecture supports a wide range of industry needs, making it adaptable and reliable.

What are the most important features?

Real-time Alerts: Immediate notifications for informed decision-making.
Threat Intelligence: Advanced analytics to identify potential risks.
Automation: Streamlined processes for quick and efficient response.
Integration: Seamless connectivity with existing tools and systems.
Scalability: Supports varying levels of operational demands.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Response Times: Accelerates the ability to react to critical situations.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes disruption-related expenses through proactive management.
Enhanced Safety: Protects people and assets with timely interventions.
Operational Continuity: Reduces downtime ensuring uninterrupted operations.

In the healthcare industry, OnSolve Platform supports emergency readiness by ensuring seamless communication during crises. In transportation, it enhances logistics planning by addressing route disruptions. Retailers use it for supply chain continuity, accommodating sudden market changes efficiently. Financial institutions utilize it to safeguard data against potential breaches, ensuring compliance and security. Across different sectors, its implementation varies but consistently delivers robust event management capabilities tailored to industry-specific challenges.

OnSolve

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Gift of Life Michigan, The Salvation Army Greater New York Division, PR Newswire, Carnival Group, The United Network for Organ Sharing, Virgin Atlantic, University of Delaware, NetApp, CME Group

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

November 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, SolarWinds and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.