PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters comparison

Why PeerSpot?

PagerDuty and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. PagerDuty is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Everbridge is ranked #12. PagerDuty holds a 7.6% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of PagerDuty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Read 97 PagerDuty Operations Cloud reviews

10,282 Views
5,347 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

3,103 Views
2,762 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2026

PagerDuty Operations Cloud and xMatters compete in incident management. PagerDuty excels with its alerting and integration capabilities, making it standout for rapid response, while xMatters has advantages in workflow automation and customization.

Features: PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers real-time mobile notifications for critical incidents, enabling immediate awareness and response. Its integration capabilities are notable, allowing seamless connection with various tools, and it is recognized for its system reliability. xMatters provides strong automation features with a REST API, supporting custom workflows and detailed logging, enhancing flexibility for users.

Room for Improvement: PagerDuty Operations Cloud could benefit from more integration with monitoring and observability tools, enhancements to its mobile app, and more competitive pricing for small to mid-sized teams. xMatters needs improvement in noise reduction during alert handling, and some users find the interface challenging, which could be refined for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PagerDuty Operations Cloud supports Hybrid, Private, and Public Cloud deployments, and generally receives praise for responsive customer service, although some users face delays. xMatters offers straightforward deployment options, especially in Hybrid and Public Clouds, with reliable customer service, though users occasionally raise pricing concerns.

Pricing and ROI: PagerDuty Operations Cloud is perceived as expensive, notably for smaller teams, but showcases significant ROI through time savings and improved incident response efficiency. xMatters is also noted for high pricing; however, it justifies costs through savings on potential incident expenses and productivity gains.

To learn more, read our detailed PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,753 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), AIOps (4th), Critical Event Management (CEM) (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (3rd)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of PagerDuty Operations Cloud is 7.6%, down from 22.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.2%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PagerDuty Operations Cloud	7.6%
xMatters	4.2%
Other	88.2%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2879727

Cloud Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified incident response has reduced alert noise and improves on-call focus and coordination

PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its noise reduction by making deduplication and suppression more automated instead of manually tuned, and the service dependency graph could be more intuitive with cleaner visuals and easier-to-understand root cause tracing during major incidents. Automation could go further with smarter runbook triggers and AI-driven suggestions to help find root causes, which could save a lot of time for engineers who are struggling to understand what is actually happening. These AI capabilities could lower the time by maybe 50–60%. Analytics and reporting could be more flexible, allowing custom dashboards and filters and team-level MTTA and MTTR breakdowns, so that it is segregated based on teams and it is much easier to have custom dashboards for the teams to understand more. Alert storms were a recurring frustration for the on-call team, and escalation overrides and service dependency graphs can get a bit confusing in larger environments. More customizable analytics and smarter automation would make the platform even easier, more flexible and more powerful for the team to understand. PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its analytics flexibility with customized dashboards and AI capabilities to be more trained and more reliable. Service dependency mapping can also feel cluttered in big environments, making it harder to trace upstream and downstream impacts during bigger incidents. We implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI to help with alert grouping and early incident insights, but accuracy was not consistent enough to rely on during critical events. It occasionally grouped unrelated alerts or missed correlations, which limited the operational efficiency gains we expected. The on-call team still depended heavily on manual triage because AI suggestions were not always aligned with the real root cause. Overall, AI added some value but it has not yet reached the reliability needed to significantly improve the incident response efficiency. It needs more training or more work.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"PagerDuty has allowed us to identify issues and incidents within the infrastructure that we wouldn't have noticed otherwise."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been highly beneficial, preventing numerous outages through prompt response and incident alerting capabilities, demonstrating significant ROI."

"Because of the alert mechanism, our support technicians are prompted about support cases at risk."

"Since using PagerDuty Operations Cloud, I have noticed specific outcomes such as faster incident resolution, recurring issues were monitored properly, and recurring incidents were corrected and have stopped."

"It is one of the most critical things you can do in your infrastructure, and it is a no-brainer, just do it."

"With PagerDuty Operations Cloud's alert reduction feature, I have noticed that it helped me prevent costly incidents in my organization."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud is one of the important aspects in our organization which we use widely for incident response and quick incident resolution."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud changed the process and the flow in our team very smoothly."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pros

"For our organization, sending notifications out via subscriptions for outages."

"Automation of our incident notification process has increased our capability to respond."

"The on-call schedule that they have for groups is amazing in terms of how it works and how it triggers. You don't need to do anything. You just upload the users, and you have the calendar of the schedules. It is amazing how it works and how easy it is to work with this feature."

"It helped change behavior across the organization to improve accountability."

"xMatters stood out to us during our research because of the versatility of its rotas, how we could set up various group rotas, different shift patterns, the ability to order devices and add personal devices etc. It's a much more flexible solution than ServiceNow, the in-house tool we also evaluated."

"The Flow Designer is quite valuable, as you can set up integrations and flows without necessarily needing to know about code."

"Having this automated has led to a significant improvement in incident resolution time (resolution can now occur quicker than the time to previously contact the correct person)."

"We haven't evaluated any product recently, but from what I can tell, looking around online, what xMatters has that others don't have are the custom forms. That's the big differentiator at the moment because that's something that we heavily use."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"PagerDuty could improve the event orchestration by enhancing features, such as easier condition setup inside the orchestration."

"Because of the way you have to structure the rosters, if an engineer has to go on leave (or something), you can't just go in and reassign/take this person out of all of the different rosters that they're in. You have to go into each of the rosters and take them out. There might be a roster for business hours, after hours rotation, and monitoring deployments. Each time we need to take an engineer out of the pool, e.g., if they're sick or on leave, then we have to go and touch all of those rosters, updating and replacing them. Whereas, if we could just take the person out and have it automatically fill in the rostering, then that would make life a lot easier for managing it."

"The learning curve for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a bit steep, with its complicated rules and schedules, and we have to dedicate a proper team to use that tool."

"One suggestion for improving PagerDuty Operations Cloud is to provide more insights about incidents, such as root cause analysis or additional information, which could assist SRE teams in reducing remediation time and incident detection before jumping on a call."

"I am not a direct end user of PagerDuty. It's hard to consider its shortcomings in that sense."

"Because of the way you have to structure the rosters, if an engineer has to go on leave, you can't just go in and reassign or take this person out of all of the different rosters that they're in."

"One area for improvement in PagerDuty Operations Cloud is the unpredictable costs that can cause issues in our organization and project complexity, along with the occasional perception of an outdated user interface by non-tech personnel."

"Customer support can be improved. At times, we get a delay in response."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud cons

"They could make the product more customizable."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"What I would like it to do is tell me anytime there is a P1 incident, except when the ticket is assigned to this team or when this word is in the summary, but there is no exclusion option."

"We would like to see a greater variety of integrations with ServiceNow. It works fine as it is, but an enhancement would be the ability to interact with the major incident module in ServiceNow... The way our major incident process works, when an incident is elevated from a P1 to a major incident, that is an extra flag in ServiceNow. It would be awesome to have xMatters get notification when something goes from a P1 to a major and then have it go through a different workflow, rather than our regular P1."

"I would like some minor UI changes. I believe I filed some enhancement requests with xMatters. For example, in one area, they have some way for you to look at a particular functionality with different sets of reporting UI. However, that same reporting UI is not yet available with some other functionalities. Essentially, in their existing functionality, the xMatters application does an excellent job, but in other functionalities within their UI, they don't have that. On the back-end, they are related. Instead of one click where you can see everything, right now you need to go to different areas to access similar information. It would be nice to have everything in one place. While they have an excellent element A, I am hoping that they could just simply make that feature also available in their element B."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

"The data validation and verification need to be enhanced so that when data is changed, it reviews it in an automated manner and catches all of the anomalies."

"Every customer would like a free ride, of course, and being a customer, I definitely feel the pricing is too high."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing may be about $1,000 per user."

"The cost is quite high. But if you want to get a full-featured application and you have a big team..."

"There is a license needed to use PagerDuty."

"If we wanted phone calls or additional SMSs, we would have to pitch up for those. They give us so many per month per user, then we have to pay extra if it goes over that."

"They're very good in pricing compared to the competitors in the area. I would rate them a five out of five in terms of pricing."

"The price is very high."

"The cost is based on the package you select."

"The solution is paid on a monthly basis and represents about 1% of the platform's budget."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pricing and cost advice

"Licensing varies widely, depending on usage. It can be cheap or quite expensive, depending on volume and features."

"The only potential concern is professional services. They are capable, but like to bill on an hourly basis."

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"The pricing is tiered so we took that into account. If we were to license 10 or 20 people, that would be a certain price. And if we were to license 50 or 100, there would be a little bit of discounting. But the per-user license was right in line with what we were expecting."

"I don't make the decisions on the cost aspect. We haven't had any complaints. I think it has a reasonable price."

"We're currently per license. We're paying around $44,000 per year for 80 full users and 300 standard users. For a new implementation, we also need to pay for an expert."

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

"I know roughly what we pay per year. For what we use it for and what its purpose is, it is very valuable."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	77

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PagerDuty?

PagerDuty Operations Cloud's pricing felt reasonable but it definitely is not the cheapest option. The value comes more from reliability than cost savings. Setup costs were minimal since it is a Sa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PagerDuty?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PagerDuty?

I have used PagerDuty Operations Cloud for two years, so I have over two years of experience with it. My main duties in PagerDuty Operations Cloud are incident routing, escalation policies, on-call...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Opsgenie vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

BigPanda vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Moogsoft vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud Competitors

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 17% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 16% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 5% of the time

Rootly vs xMatters

Compared 4% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

August 2026

Download PagerDuty Operations Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

August 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

PagerDuty Operations Cloud focuses on efficient incident management, featuring advanced alert and notification systems, mobile alerts, and AI-driven functionalities that facilitate streamlined on-call schedules and integrations with major monitoring tools.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers comprehensive incident management with real-time alerts and notifications via mobile, SMS, and calls. This empowers teams to respond swiftly and reduce missed incidents. Efficient on-call management through automated scheduling and escalation enhances team productivity, while AI-driven alert grouping minimizes noise. Integration with tools like AWS and Datadog further streamlines operations.

What are the key features of PagerDuty Operations Cloud?

Real-time Incident Alerts: Improves response times by ensuring immediate notifications.
AI-driven Alert Grouping: Minimizes noise for enhanced focus and efficiency.
Automated Scheduling: Streamlines on-call management and escalation.
Monitoring Tool Integration: Seamlessly works with tools like AWS and Datadog.
Mobile Alerts: Enables SMS and call notifications for instant communication.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational burden through automation.
Improved Team Productivity: Lowers incident noise and accelerates resolution.
Enhanced Customization: Tailors alert prioritization and escalation policies.
Time Savings: Expedites incident management and reduces error rates.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud implementation spans industries like e-commerce and IT services, where it automates anomaly detection and manages high-severity incidents. Its integration capabilities and AIOps features significantly enhance incident management, proving valuable for sectors demanding real-time performance and responsiveness.

PagerDuty

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

40% of the Fortune 100 TrustPagerDuty. Customers include: Slack, Intuit, Zendesk, Panasonic, Pinterest, Airbnb, eHarmony, McKesson, Comcast

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

August 2026

Free Report: PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.