IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Nintex Workflow vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText ProVision
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well.""The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good.""This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment.""I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

More Nintex Workflow Pros →

"All the features come as part of a standard license.""The stability of the product is very good."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

Cons
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems.""The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general.""Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.""We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

More Nintex Workflow Cons →

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Comparatively, it's expensive."
  • "We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
  • "The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
  • "This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."
  • More Nintex Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    All the features come as part of a standard license.
    Top Answer: 
    Unfortunately, the licensing is only for an end-user so you can't have a shared license like a concurrent license.
    Top Answer: 
    My main complaint is that the solution is not open source in the sense that you can't have your own in-house developments. The only thing that they can support is certain APIs that can help you… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,378
    Comparisons
    2,517
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    453
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    568
    Comparisons
    399
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    332
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nintex Workflow Platform
    Metastorm ProVision
    Learn More
    Overview

    At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

    OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
    Offer
    Learn more about Nintex Workflow
    Learn more about OpenText ProVision
    Sample Customers
    Asiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
    Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText ProVision
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Nintex Workflow is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Workflow is rated 8.2, while OpenText ProVision is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Stable with okay pricing but needs better integration capabilities". Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Camunda Platform, ServiceNow Orchestration, Bizagi and ARIS BPA, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bonita. See our Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText ProVision report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.