NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs Statseeker comparison

NETSCOUT and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #78, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. NETSCOUT holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

547 Views
311 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competitors in the network monitoring sector. Statseeker holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while InfiniStreamNG's advanced features make it a strong choice for detailed network analytics.

Features: Statseeker offers rapid deployment, effective bandwidth monitoring, and a small footprint ideal for budget-sensitive users. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides real-time threat detection, deep packet inspection, and extensive analytical functions, catering to enterprises with complex network needs.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its feature set, expand analytical capabilities, and improve threat detection. InfiniStreamNG might benefit from simplifying deployment, reducing the need for substantial support, and potentially lowering setup costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for easy deployment with limited technical needs, complemented by responsive support. InfiniStreamNG requires a more structured deployment process due to its complexity but offers comprehensive guidance during setup.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is attractive for its low initial cost and quick ROI, making it suitable for businesses with budget constraints. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while more expensive initially, offers a robust set of features that justify its price and promise substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."

"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."

"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"The most valuable features are speed and cost."

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

"The product is stable. I have never had any issue where we have lost an InfiniStream, or visibility from that particular InfiniStream, throughout the bank."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product could be cheaper."

"The price is a little high."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 35% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 30% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 18% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 17% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

No data available

Overview

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

U.S. Department of Defense

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Free Report: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.