NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs Statseeker comparison

NETSCOUT and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #77, while Techniche is ranked #66 with an average rating of 7.0. NETSCOUT holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

1,249 Views
1,187 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

1,232 Views
1,170 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competitors in the network monitoring sector. Statseeker holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while InfiniStreamNG's advanced features make it a strong choice for detailed network analytics.

Features: Statseeker offers rapid deployment, effective bandwidth monitoring, and a small footprint ideal for budget-sensitive users. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides real-time threat detection, deep packet inspection, and extensive analytical functions, catering to enterprises with complex network needs.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its feature set, expand analytical capabilities, and improve threat detection. InfiniStreamNG might benefit from simplifying deployment, reducing the need for substantial support, and potentially lowering setup costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for easy deployment with limited technical needs, complemented by responsive support. InfiniStreamNG requires a more structured deployment process due to its complexity but offers comprehensive guidance during setup.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is attractive for its low initial cost and quick ROI, making it suitable for businesses with budget constraints. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while more expensive initially, offers a robust set of features that justify its price and promise substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Statseeker	0.4%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Go with NETSCOUT."

"The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"We are attracting customers in good sized numbers as we advertise and market this solution."

"The most valuable features are speed and cost."

"Because we are doing proactive monitoring instead of reactive, the end users don't even see that there is something wrong."

"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."

"From a troubleshooting perspective, it allows us to quickly search all data TAP points in the network and helps our network engineers get to root cause quickly."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

"We have used this product since the organization was established and it has been an integral part of our business as usual functions and I would suggest that if we stopped using it then this would have a negative impact on our operations."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."

"The solution reduces the complexity of our network monitoring because it can make my engineers do their jobs faster."

"The product does what we need it to do, and definitely gives us heads-up on results and issues we are having in a timely manner."

"It is very scalable, stable, easy to use and manage."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

"The interface looks like a Windows 3.1 program. It needs a complete refresh."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"The interface for this solution is terrible and can be improved in literally any way."

"Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff."

"I’ve seen two Statseeker techs work several hours to fix it."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"The price is a little high."

"This product could be cheaper."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Comparisons

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 17% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 13% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 12% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 11% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

March 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

March 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

No data available

Overview

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

U.S. Department of Defense

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Free Report: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.