OpenText Data Protector vs Veeam Data Platform comparison

OpenText and Veeam Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5, while Veeam Software is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to Veeam Software’s 16.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Veeam Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,521 Views
931 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Veeam Data Platform

Read 423 Veeam Data Platform reviews

31,622 Views
26,194 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Veeam Data Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and Veeam Data Platform both compete in the backup solutions category. Veeam Data Platform has an upper hand due to its ease of use and strong VM recovery capabilities.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is known for comprehensive integration capabilities across applications such as Oracle, SQL Server, and VMware. It excels in compatibility and flexibility with various OS environments. Veeam Data Platform is valued for its instant recovery features, granular file-level restores, and seamless VM environment integration.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs a more intuitive graphical interface, better documentation, and improved virtualization support. Complex integrations and frequent bugs are also reported. Veeam Data Platform could enhance support for physical server backups and integrate better with different storage vendors. The complexity of backup configurations is another area for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector often involves a complicated on-premises deployment process, with customer service varying in quality. Veeam Data Platform, with support for both on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, receives praise for easier deployment and better customer service, though it can be occasionally complex when interacting with support staff.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's diverse licensing model can lead to higher costs, especially for larger environments. Veeam Data Platform offers competitive pricing with a clear per-CPU socket model, and users report higher value for money and strong ROI due to reduced operational overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veeam Data Platform

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

423

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (1st), Virtualization Management Tools (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veeam Data Platform is 16.4%, down from 20.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Edward Hore

L3 Infrastructure Engineer at Specsavers

Reliable with good support but needs a better navigation menu

We use Veeam Data to back up our VMware infrastructure Veeam Data Platform is valuable for its stability and the ability to easily contact support for assistance. The support team provides answers whenever we need them. It is also one of the most scalable backup solutions I've worked with. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was relatively easy."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

"I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data."

"This solution is quite stable because we have only three users."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"I think Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) is an excellent solution for ensuring user-side disaster recovery. It involves a platform on-premise, which can be replicated to another site. It's a very effective solution, and we prioritize both the FTO and the FTO."

"The most valuable feature is adaptability, where it automatically adapts to the environment that it's being installed on."

"The solution does a good job with VM backups."

"It is a stable product with useful snapshot and replication features."

"The product could be improved if they wrote more PowerShell scripts for controlling Veeam."

"The backup and replication features are most valuable."

"One of the best things about Veeam is that they have consistently improved on themselves since they started. Personally, I've been using Veeam since around 2013/2014 when it was only supporting certain hypervisors such as HyperV, and since then it has become truly mature enterprise-level software with a lot of versatility."

"Very flexible, all-in-one solution."

More Veeam Data Platform pros

Cons

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"The technical support was very slow."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated"

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"The pricing model could be improved. It can be made cheaper."

"We had one problem once with the network."

"Veeam Backup Replication is a bit difficult to use. If you have used other solutions such as Commvault, you will find it is much easier to use. Veeam Backup Replication does backups in a different way that is not as simple as other solutions. Doing backups of SQL Servers is much easier in Commvault. However, the difficulty could be the lack of experience I have had with Veeam Backup Replication."

"Could be improved with hybrid cloud integration backup."

"There is a bug that prevents enabling the restore button, which is hectic."

"We'd like to see them add more custom templates."

"Its native capability for talking to the public cloud needs improvement. Connecting to a public cloud is a little bit more of a challenge when it comes to Veeam than it is with Rubrik or Commvault. There are still some hoops that you got to jump through in order to send Veeam backups out to public cloud repositories. It is not as simple as it is with other products."

"The solution could improve by having more user-friendly dashboards."

More Veeam Data Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"We are on an annual license for Veeam Backup Replication. We could expand or upgrade the license for the Office365 features. Next year we might go to a three-year plan for support on license."

"It is reasonably very cheap. I would rate the licensing model a one out of ten, where one is very affordable and ten is extremely expensive."

"The price of Veeam Backup & Replication is reasonable compared to IBM."

"We use the community edition of the Veeam Backup Replication and it is a software-based license. It can be a little expensive."

"The price is quite competitive compared to other products in my region."

"We pay for a license to use this solution, and we recommend that our customers pay for a license and a renewal license."

"The price is a bit high. Licensing type is VMware friendly, so it is easy."

"We have a yearly perpetual license."

More Veeam Data Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

How do the backup solutions of Veeam and Veritas compare?

Technically, Veeam is best for hyper-v & VMWare replications, snapshots, HA failover, also support for file system backups inside VMs., support for tape library & FC too. But Veritas Netbac...

See all answers

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Veeam Data Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs Veeam Data Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veeam Data Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Backup vs Veeam Data Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Zerto vs Veeam Data Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Veeam Data Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Veeam Data Platform

April 2025

Download Veeam Data Platform product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam ONE

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Veeam Data Platform ensures comprehensive data resilience by offering secure backups and intelligent data insights, catering to the complexities of modern data management.

Veeam Data Platform empowers businesses with reliable data protection, orchestrated recovery, and streamlined management. Providing peace of mind, it guarantees data is secure, available, and effortlessly recoverable. Organizations benefit from features such as instant recovery, simplified management, and compatibility with virtual environments. While it shines in backup and restore capabilities, it calls for improvements in integration with physical servers and enhanced cyber security features.

What are the key features of Veeam Data Platform?

Instant Recovery: Allows immediate data restoration with minimal downtime.
Simplified Management: Intuitive interfaces for managing data with ease.
Efficient Replication: Supports reliable duplication for high availability.
Seamless VM Backups: Integrates well with virtual environments like VMware and Hyper-V.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers robust alerting for proactive data management.

What are the notable benefits of using Veeam Data Platform?

Reliability: Trustworthy backup and restore functionalities.
Scalability: Supports cloud integration for expanding data needs.
Time Efficiency: Fast recovery processes minimizing business impact.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse data management requirements.
Peace of Mind: Assures persistent data availability and protection.

Organizations in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing utilize Veeam Data Platform for critical data management, ensuring business continuity and disaster recovery. Employed in securing both virtual and physical workloads, Veeam integrates cloud storage for enhanced scalability and efficiency.

Veeam Software

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Business & Legal Resources Inc., Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities, Alliance Healthcare, Poulin Grain Inc., Linear Technology, Northwestern University, ARKEMA, Sogegross, City of Lynchburg

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Veeam Data Platform report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.