Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

N-able Cove Data Protection vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

N-able and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N-able is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. N-able holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
N-able Cove Data Protection
Read 23 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews
  • 3,635 Views
  • 2,036 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
OpenText Data Protector
Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews
  • 1,775 Views
  • 1,527 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and N-able Cove Data Protection are two popular data protection solutions. N-able Cove Data Protection seems to be a superior product due to its features, and users feel it is worth the price.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers robust backup and recovery options and integrates well with various platforms. Users appreciate its scalability and detailed reporting capabilities. N-able Cove Data Protection features cloud-first architecture, seamless integration with RMM tools, and automated backup verification. Users value its simplicity and reliability. N-able Cove Data Protection stands out for its enhanced cloud capabilities and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Users of OpenText Data Protector point out the need for a more intuitive setup process and improved technical support documentation. They also mention the desire for faster backups. N-able Cove Data Protection users suggest enhancements in reporting features and better pricing transparency. They also highlight the need for more granular control over backup schedules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is often mentioned as requiring a complex deployment process and users report mixed experiences with customer service. N-able Cove Data Protection receives praise for its straightforward cloud deployment model and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is noted for its competitive pricing and solid return on investment, although some users find the initial setup costs a bit high. N-able Cove Data Protection users report satisfaction with the cost-effectiveness and express positive ROI experiences, citing its feature set justifies the expense.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

N-able Cove Data Protection
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
41st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (16th), SaaS Backup (7th), MSP Backup (1st)
OpenText Data Protector
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Data Protector0.8%
N-able Cove Data Protection1.1%
Other98.1%
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Per MøllerJacobsen - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers cost-effective data backup with room for search improvements
The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems. You cannot just search for something—you need to know where it was and when it was there to restore it, plus it would be nice to take out data from Microsoft 365 in some portable format, which is currently not an option. I would like to extract the data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format, something like a database or maybe just to take out a PST file or SharePoint and Teams files to the file system. Especially in these times, where we discuss potential risks with the Microsoft cloud for European companies, companies would want to know how to access their data from the backup if they suddenly don't have a tenant. I believe there should be the ability to take out data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format. I know that Cohesity is working on making such a thing. It's not there yet; I asked last week for something for forensics, and the support team said it's not possible yet, but I know from our technical account manager they are working on some solutions.
Read full review
Jeroen Vranckaerts - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to back up, restore, and do different types of testing for the preventative maintenance has really increased our importance to these clients because they see the value in how fast we can get them back up and running. We're saving them money in that way."
"The most valuable feature of N-able Cove Data Protection is its ease of use."
"For starters, this is one of few databases that allow us to backup MySQL databases, most others only support Microsoft SQL. This solution also has a very user-friendly interface accessed through a web browser. Additionally, backups can be easily configured through N-able Backup."
"The initial setup of N-able Cove Data Protection was very easy."
"It provides a single dashboard for all types of data protection, we monitor everything through a single dashboard. It simplifies everything overall. It allows us to see everything, whether passing or failing any issues, any problems through a single pane of glass that we don't have to click through or adjust as we go forward."
"The most valuable aspect is the added protection of having a cloud-based backup service. It provides redundancy in case of data loss."
"We use a neat feature called VDR status, Virtual Disaster Recovery status. It only works on servers... It's automated. Once or twice a month it will virtually mount the backup and provide a screenshot and advise whether or not there have been any errors."
"One of the bigger features and advantages of the solution is that it is easy to integrate with my RMM which is also N-able."
More N-able Cove Data Protection pros
"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."
"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."
"The reliability of HP Data Protector is the most valuable feature for us."
"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."
"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."
"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."
"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."
More OpenText Data Protector pros
 

Cons

"N-able Cove Data Protection does not provide a lot of SaaS backup products, which is an area they can improve. Additionally, there are some limitations on the storage side, where I cannot have a lot of employees backing up their data."
"This solution is not very good for image restores, mainly just files. The solution also does not allow you to enable or disable backups. Sometimes, our users will connect via mobile device and it will use their data to perform the backup. If they were able to enable and disable the backup, they would not have this issue."
"Integration with a hybrid cloud is something that I found complicated."
"The one thing they don't are Linux servers, it's Windows only. I understand that directive. I have another product that I use for our Linux servers and stuff, but it would be nice if they had that flexibility on the Linux side. I understand the development and the world is geared towards Windows in 365, I know that's where the clienteles are and the business and the money is."
"The reporting feature and functionality need improvement. We would like to see a little bit more detailed reporting that offers more CEO or C-level focused reporting options."
"N-able Cove Data Protection for Microsoft 365 is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems."
"One area I don't like has to do with the agent that goes on the system... if a system stays offline for some length of time, say for a week or so, I may have to go back in and reinstall the agent to get it back in business. I don't know what's causing that."
More N-able Cove Data Protection cons
"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."
"The technical support was very slow."
"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."
"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."
"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."
"The online backups of Office 365 have room for improvement. This is now available for the Exchange Online part of Office 365, but we're still waiting for SharePoint Online, Teams, etc. We know that it's coming, but it takes time."
"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."
"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."
More OpenText Data Protector cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry."
"The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less."
"The cost is around ten dollars per workstation a month and that includes a certain amount of data."
"N-able Cove Data Protection is an averagely-priced product."
"The pricing is very competitive and it's well worth the price."
"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."
"Cove only takes the data you have on the physical server. I can back that up for long periods of time, and I don't accrue high charges to have the data in the cloud. It stays at one rate. This allows me to forecast payment for the next one or two years and show clients their estimated growth."
"The only option I would like to see is an adjustable scale. Right now we have 250 seats and we're not using all of them. It would be nice to be able to save that little bit of money by being able to buy just what we need."
More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice
"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."
"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."
"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."
"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."
"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."
"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."
"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."
"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."
More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?
In terms of pricing, N-able Cove Data Protection is neither cheap nor expensive compared to other competitors.
See all answers
What needs improvement with N-able Backup?
The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems. You cannot just search for s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for N-able Backup?
Our main use cases for enabling N-able Cove Data Protection include backing up our customers' data on servers hosted in data centers and servers hosted in our own data center, as well as a few onsi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?
I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?
The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?
OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection
Compared 13% of the time
Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection Logo
Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Acronis Cyber Protect vs N-able Cove Data Protection Logo
Acronis Cyber Protect vs N-able Cove Data Protection
Compared 6% of the time
NinjaOne vs N-able Cove Data Protection Logo
NinjaOne vs N-able Cove Data Protection
Compared 5% of the time
Boxafe vs N-able Cove Data Protection Logo
Boxafe vs N-able Cove Data Protection
Compared 5% of the time
More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors
Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 42% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 12% of the time
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 9% of the time
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 8% of the time
Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText Data Protector Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
N-able Cove Data Protection
September 2025
N-able Cove Data Protection reportDownload N-able Cove Data Protection product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
September 2025
OpenText Data Protector reportDownload OpenText Data Protector product report
 

Also Known As

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup
Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector
 

Overview

Cove Data Protection, from N-able, is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard critical business data. It offers a range of features including backup and recovery, disaster recovery, and endpoint protection. With automated backups and flexible scheduling options, it ensures data is protected and easily recoverable. 

The solution also includes advanced security measures such as encryption and ransomware detection to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. Cove Data Protection provides seamless integration with various platforms and offers centralized management for efficient monitoring and control. 

With its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities, Cove Data Protection is an ideal choice for businesses seeking reliable data protection.

N-able
OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia
GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company
Buyer's Guide
N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector
September 2025
Free Report: N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector
Find out what your peers are saying about N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.