Microsoft Project Server vs Process Street comparison

Microsoft and Process Street are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Process Street users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews

1,299 Views
662 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Process Street

Read 3 Process Street reviews

2 Views
0 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Process Street

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Process Street based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (5th)

Process Street

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (135th)

Featured Reviews

Mouloud Fourali

Project Manager at Digital Research Alliance of Canada

Visual project planning enhances collaboration and proactive management

The dependency management in Microsoft Project is highly valuable, as it visually maps dependencies and impacts within a project plan. The online version facilitates easy collaboration without having to share multiple versions of the file. The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.

Read full review

reviewer2764182

CEO and Digital Strategy Consultant at a training & coaching company with 1-10 employees

Has improved workflow accuracy and team autonomy across multiple departments

I find several features of Process Street especially valuable. Dynamic workflow management allows me to update processes “in-flight” without causing disruption. Automation capabilities have streamlined onboarding, client delivery, and project milestones. Zapier integrations have unified multiple platforms, including ClickUp, the CRM, and Front, ensuring seamless data flow. The tool supports scalability, managing 20–30 web builds simultaneously with predictable outcomes. Its customizable templates make it easy for teams to create or adapt workflows for new clients or services. Cross-department flexibility means that it is used successfully in HR, finance, marketing, and project management. Accountability tools, such as task assignments and transparent tracking, ensure that nothing falls behind.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scheduling and the customization are very powerful."

"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."

"Microsoft Project Server is a powerful tool I've used for years."

"The solution is scalable and easy to expand."

"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."

"It's stable and reliable."

"This is a scalable solution. It is easy to set up and to add clusters to your environment."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"Process Street is a cornerstone of Accentuate’s operational excellence; it powers every aspect of the business, from onboarding and HR to client project management and marketing execution."

"At Planning Pros, we leveraged Process Street to eliminate manual inefficiencies and compliance risks in our daily operations, with automated client onboarding and built-in compliance checks leading to $20,000 in annual savings and faster processing completed in hours instead of days."

"Process Street transformed Rent Builder Property Management’s operations by standardizing and automating property onboarding processes, reducing setup time by nearly 75%, and increasing tenant management efficiency by 25% through streamlined communication."

Cons

"We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly."

"In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket."

"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."

"The solution's synchronization with Jira Projects should be improved."

"Microsoft doesn't always have all the answers, and they rely more on communities. Their support tends to decline when not supporting cloud solutions, and there is often an attempt to upsell alternate products rather than solve problems."

"The initial setup was complex."

"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."

"I am not convinced that the pricing model is the right one."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"Process Street could benefit from expanded in-app analytics or deeper native integrations with CRMs and project management platforms to reduce reliance on third-party tools such as Zapier."

"I would like to see enhanced built-in compliance reporting dashboards designed specifically for small firms."

"Process Street could benefit from expanded in-app analytics or deeper native integrations with CRMs and project management platforms to reduce reliance on third-party tools such as Zapier."

"I would like to see enhanced built-in compliance reporting dashboards designed specifically for small firms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."

"It is on the expensive side."

"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."

"The product is expensive."

"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."

"Microsoft Project Server is an expensive solution. Small businesses will not be able to afford it."

"There are some payments related to the licensing cost of Microsoft Project Server."

"There is a licensing cost."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?

The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 20% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 10% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Planisware vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

October 2025

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

October 2025

Download Process Street product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.

Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.

What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Management: Allocate and track resources efficiently to optimize productivity.
Portfolio Analysis: Assess and prioritize projects based on strategic alignment and constraints.
Time Reporting: Streamline time tracking and reporting for accurate project insights.
Integration with Office: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office applications for enhanced productivity.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data security with customizable permissions and compliance standards.

What benefits can users expect from Microsoft Project Server?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and collaboration among project teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers comprehensive data analytics for strategic planning.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines project management workflows for increased productivity.
Cost Management: Enables effective budget tracking and financial control.

Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.

Microsoft

Information not available

Process Street

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.