We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Notion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."
"Microsoft Project Server is simple to use."
"Project schedule management is very good. Basically, it sits on SharePoint. So, every time we create a project, a new project site is created within that SharePoint environment, which is a very good document repository. It allows us to create issues and risks lists and additional functionality to keep track of what's going on with projects."
"The most useful feature of Microsoft Project Server is you can select a function to see the baseline."
"In the competitive landscape of project management and portfolio management solutions, Microsoft Project Server stands out significantly."
"It is well-established, reliable, and compatible."
"It can scale well."
"The solution scales well."
"Notion is a great tool for note-keeping and note-sharing."
"The product has a valuable feature for databases. It has a table and a calendar view and saves various documents in the system."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The ability to structure data is one of the most essential functions of Notion."
"We can install it on mobile phones, making it feasible to manage productivity."
"I like the high level of customization in Notion."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility...The initial setup of Notion is easy."
"The product is easy to use and has good responsiveness."
"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."
"There need to be more tutorials available to users."
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."
"Microsoft Project Server could improve by making the solution more user-friendly."
"The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use."
"The solution's desktop version is not compatible with the MacBook."
"Microsoft Project Server's user interface is pretty average, and sometimes it can have bugs."
"The solution's synchronization with Jira Projects should be improved."
"Notion's UI could be better."
"The product could be integrated with external platforms."
"One area for improvement in the solution is the absence of integrated charts."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product."
"Notion's UI needs improvement."
"The linked view of database, along with the sharing and permission settings, are areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."
"Adding more color options to the application would enhance its usability and flexibility, allowing users to better customize their content"
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Notion is ranked 17th in Project Management Software with 8 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Notion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Notion writes "Highly-recommended and customizable solution for extensive data management". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Notion is most compared with Microsoft Project, Bitrix24, Wrike and Zendesk. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Notion report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
