Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs Oracle Beehive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,570 views|2,418 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
80 views|55 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Oracle Beehive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
RicardoPedro
MarcAllaire
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast.""Document management and records management features are the most valuable.""The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part.""It's a very robust product.""The support from Microsoft is very quick and they are very proactive.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site.""The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect.""This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pros →

"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well.""This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."

More Oracle Beehive Pros →

Cons
"Many of our customers would like to see an OCR feature, so it would be very good to have this in a future release.""The solution needs to be more collaborative. I believe they are just coming up with the themes for this right now.""The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration.""The GUI is outdated.""The product is behind in development and lacks some features.""Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you.""I would like to see the integration with Teams reinforced.""The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Cons →

"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."

More Oracle Beehive Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
  • "There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
  • "Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
  • "It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
  • More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    2,570
    Comparisons
    2,418
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    80
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
    Beehive
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

    Oracle Beehive provides an integrated set of communication and collaboration services built on a single scalable, secure, enterprise-class platform. Beehive allows users to access their collaborative information through familiar tools while enabling IT to consolidate infrastructure and implement a centrally managed, secure, and compliant collaboration environment built on Oracle technology.

    Sample Customers
    Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
    Oracle
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Oracle Beehive is ranked 26th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Oracle Beehive is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Beehive writes "Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HCL Connections, whereas Oracle Beehive is most compared with .

    See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.