Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3, while Microsoft is ranked #7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 9.4% mindshare in CCP, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Amazon WorkDocs
Read 1 Amazon WorkDocs review
  • 2,384 Views
  • 1,931 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Office SharePoint...
Read 29 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews
  • 1,409 Views
  • 1,240 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Amazon WorkDocs are competing products in cloud-based collaboration and document management. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server holds the upper hand in robust integration and advanced features, while Amazon WorkDocs is favored for simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server provides robust integration with Office applications, advanced customization, and comprehensive document management. Amazon WorkDocs offers secure file storage and sharing, real-time editing, and access across devices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon WorkDocs features straightforward cloud integration and responsive support. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server requires more intensive setup and professional IT support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server involves higher setup costs but offers significant ROI when capabilities are maximized. Amazon WorkDocs provides a cost-effective entry with a pay-as-you-go model, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon WorkDocs
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Office SharePoint...
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon WorkDocs is 9.4%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is 6.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

DA
A great collaboration service for small organizations
The synchronization should be simplified. Other solutions like Dropbox and OneDrive have apps. I tried using the mobile version, but it didn't work properly, that needs to be improved. It was cumbersome. It's a good solution for a small organization like ours, but it really depends on your use-cases and the size of your organization. I had a very bitter experience with their mobile app. It was challenging to even download it and once I did, I wasn't even able to log into my system. The mobile app needs to improved for easy use.
Read full review
Jaufre Rouanet - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration enhances workflow while user support requires improvement
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server should add some 'tip of the days' and small videos to help users grow within their experience with SharePoint. More integration with Copilot and with the AI platform would be great. Additionally, having the ability in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server to summarize when bringing in SharePoint folders would be beneficial, providing extracts, analysis, proposals, and summaries of those documents.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is great for inviting and sharing documents with other users."
"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."
"The solution's most valuable features is its document management. It allows sharing with external users and integrates well with Office apps and Microsoft Flow."
"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling."
"The most valuable feature is the "Alert Me", which provides the ability to set an alert when content is either added or changed and that the alerts can be either real-time or aggregated for the day or the week."
"The software is friendly to use for mixing data and analyzing it."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros
 

Cons

"I had a very bitter experience with their mobile app."
"The product is behind in development and lacks some features."
"The GUI is outdated."
"It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are concerned, it is moving more towards configuration management rather than programming. When we are doing solutions, we are basically just configuring it to make solutions happen rather than actually using the Visual Studio code and developing from scratch in the cloud. It is almost like creating an app. You have created an app for your phone, but the app doesn't really sit on your phone. It sits somewhere on a server, and the database sits on another server. The app is just pulling and pushing information. The whole development has changed. We used to install things directly on the server and then run the application from the server. Now, it is more of a modular architecture."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result."
"I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications."
"The user interface needs improvement because there is a lot of stuff in there. I use five to eight navigation buttons. It should be more user-friendly. Frequently used menu items should be arranged in a proper way. That would be helpful."
"Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's cheaper compared to similar products available"
"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Does Amazon WorkDocs offer any unique advantages over SharePoint?
Amazon WorkDocs offers the following advantages over SharePoint: It is a fully managed service, meaning that Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure and maintenance. It is more scalab...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Amazon WorkDocs Logo
SharePoint vs Amazon WorkDocs
Compared 31% of the time
Google Workspace vs Amazon WorkDocs Logo
Google Workspace vs Amazon WorkDocs
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft OneDrive vs Amazon WorkDocs Logo
Microsoft OneDrive vs Amazon WorkDocs
Compared 10% of the time
Quip vs Amazon WorkDocs Logo
Quip vs Amazon WorkDocs
Compared 6% of the time
Office 365 vs Amazon WorkDocs Logo
Office 365 vs Amazon WorkDocs
Compared 6% of the time
More Amazon WorkDocs Competitors
Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 18% of the time
Flock vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Flock vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 5% of the time
Kiteworks vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Kiteworks vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
July 2025
Amazon WorkDocs reportDownload Amazon WorkDocs product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
June 2025
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reportDownload Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
 

Overview

Amazon WorkDocs is a fully managed, secure content creation, storage, and collaboration service. With Amazon WorkDocs, you can easily create, edit, and share content, and because it’s stored centrally on AWS, access it from anywhere on any device. Amazon WorkDocs makes it easy to collaborate with others, and lets you easily share content, provide rich feedback, and collaboratively edit documents. You can use Amazon WorkDocs to retire legacy file share infrastructure by moving file shares to the cloud. Amazon WorkDocs lets you integrate with your existing systems, and offers a rich API so that you can develop your own content-rich applications. Amazon WorkDocs is built on AWS, where your content is secured on the world's largest cloud infrastructure.

With Amazon WorkDocs, there are no upfront fees or commitments. You pay only for active user accounts, and the storage you use. Amazon WorkDocs provides a 30-day free trial with 1 TB of storage per user for up to 50 users.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Delhivery
Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.