Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

"It integrates well with calendar, scheduling, etc. It's easy for employees to make meetings and plan their agendas."

"It has a feature that allows you to retain an email and recover it as an administrator. When you activate this feature, even if a user deletes an email, the email is still in the system, and we can retrieve it as an administrator. It is a very useful function. We turn this feature on for some of the mailboxes because we need to keep all the records. I like the way emails are classified in this solution. It makes it really easy to take a look at the most important messages. This is a really good functionality. Some of the emails directly exchanged with you are marked as important and shown in one tab, and everything else is in another tab. We usually don't have any issue with Exchange. It can be integrated with different solutions."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its communication capabilities."

"The technical support services are good."

"It's pretty easy to manage."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The technical support is fine."

"The ability to share information, appointments, and agendas easily is the big value of Microsoft Exchange."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"The solution should be easier to deploy."

"They could offer simultaneous features for Exchange Online and on-premises versions. Specific features such as litigation hold and audit setups should be available on-premises."

"I think it could be more scalable."

"It is important to have the updated version for scalability."

"Exchange took time to be deployed. It requires extensive configuration and setting up servers and managing internal network access."

"I think that improvements should be made in creating greater abilities for Microsoft Exchange in terms of Reasearch and Development."

"An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations."

"When we started using Exchange on the cloud, we had a lot of initial problems relating to our main database and we also experienced issues with the accidental deletion of inboxes, amongst other things. In fact, many of the files we had moved to the cloud had disappeared. There also seems to be a problem with the retention of information."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs."

"This solution is expensive."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

"The platform has a reasonable price."

"The product pricing is reasonable if you utilize its full suite of features."

"Microsoft Exchange is an inexpensive application."

"We can get Exchange in the cloud along with the Microsoft 365 license."