Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

"The integration of Microsoft Exchange with other tools allows for seamless collaboration and increased productivity within teams."

"The availability group settings are better, so it has inherent scalability. In 2010, they added several sensible rules."

"The email management system is very easy to set up, configure, and use."

"It's so much of a part of what I do every day that I don't give it a lot of thought. It just works, for the most part, until it doesn't, in which case I call tech support."

"It is a product that is simple to manage, and easy to use."

"The ability to share information, appointments, and agendas easily is the big value of Microsoft Exchange."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its ease of use."

"It ensures high availability and resilience, allowing seamless recovery from potential failures and making it a reliable option for business-critical operations."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"Microsoft Exchange and other Microsoft solutions like Office 365 need to provide more detailed information for customers regarding the features and functionalities included in their plans, as some features are only available at an additional cost."

"I would like to see Microsoft Exchange improve their documentation."

"I think that improvements should be made in creating greater abilities for Microsoft Exchange in terms of Reasearch and Development."

"Microsoft could improve on Exchange's hybrid deployment or HCW. They need to improve on that because I was having many issues with HCW in our environment at times."

"In terms of configuring the product, that's definitely an area in which they can make some improvements on."

"One major area for improvement is the need for repeated authentication when running a meeting."

"The calendar integration in Exchange is not that great. The email features are okay, but it doesn't integrate well with the calendar and appointments, especially Zoom appointments. It integrates fine with Microsoft Teams, but Zoom is a challenge."

"After 2022, users of Microsoft Exchange have to migrate mailboxes to Microsoft Exchange Online, and what I'd like to improve is for Microsoft to publish more on-premise versions for customers using Microsoft Exchange. Having more security is another room for improvement in the solution, particularly for mailboxes that develop the Exchange Edge rule to protect internal mailboxes. What I'd like to see from Microsoft Exchange in the future is for Microsoft to still update the latest, existing version which is 2022. I'd like Microsoft to still push more cumulative updates for Microsoft Exchange 2022."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"The platform has a reasonable price."

"The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance."

"There is an annual cost to use Microsoft Exchange, and the price could be less expensive."

"We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. The larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive."

"It's working very well. There is no problem, but the price is not the best."

"Microsoft Exchange itself does not require a license, but users who will have mailboxes will require a license. It depends on the number of users to choose which license. If you exceed 2,000 mailboxes, it's preferable to get the enterprise license."

"The price of Microsoft Exchange could improve. In Egypt, the price keeps increasing."

"Microsoft Exchange is a very well-priced solution."