Microsoft Exchange Online vs ProtonMail comparison

"This solution makes it very easy to receive and detect problems about the mail flow and offers very good reporting. In general, it's very easy to manage the organization's mailboxes."

"One of the important features is the collaboration tool used in Office 365. The security and DLP mechanisms are also quite good."

"Microsoft has many consultants who can provide support."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is easy to use. You have a common storage where people can store documents. It also helps with version control."

"I like that Exchange Online is easy to use and that I do not need to maintain the previous Exchange Server. I also do not need to worry about the security of the Exchange Server. If there are any issues, then it will be the service provider's problem and not mine."

"I would rate Exchange Online's stability nine out of ten."

"The solution is easy to use and the cloud version has taken a lot of challenges away from the user."

"A valuable feature of the solution is its global usability."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"Microsoft needs to lower the price of the extra production add-ins for Exchange Online."

"When we need to purchase additional licenses for additional users, the process is slow."

"I would like to have the option to have my electronic signature posted on my emails by default. I am able to add it manually but cannot get it by default."

"The pricing could be a bit lower."

"The solution could improve with the integrations with some of the known applications is still not possible, there must be more connectors."

"Documentation is lacking."

"Microsoft Exchange Online should have a faster search feature."

"For example, recently there were some spam incidents that Microsoft does not currently mitigate because they have another paid solution to do so. It would be nice to integrate the security and the anti-spam (i.e. the fake links, etc.) along with the Exchange Online default."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The subscription fee is monthly."

"The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements."

"Our organization pays for a corporate license to use the solution."

"The product is expensive and has an annual subscription."

"There is an annual license required to use this Microsoft Exchange Online."

"We have a license per user scenario."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is an affordable solution."