Microsoft Exchange Online vs ProtonMail comparison

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online are spam filtering, 50 GB of email storage, good integration with Outlook, and ease of management."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the online archive."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange Online is if you have people that are geographically distributed from each other is good. For example, if you have people in the United States, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia, having an online solution works best because then you can reach the scale of the data centers that are available by Microsoft. Additionally, if you're only going to have two to three people using the solution the cost is a lot less than having an onsite server and licensing. It is highly beneficial in these areas."

"It is a fantastic solution."

"Message trace is the most valuable feature of the product."

"One of the important features is the collaboration tool used in Office 365. The security and DLP mechanisms are also quite good."

"I have found the interface to be user-friendly and the overall simplicity valuable features."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"The solution could improve by making the user interface better."

"Documentation is lacking."

"The solution could improve with the integrations with some of the known applications is still not possible, there must be more connectors."

"When you migrate from on-prem to cloud, if you choose to or are forced to do the hybrid, they need to devise a way to undo the hybrid."

"For example, recently there were some spam incidents that Microsoft does not currently mitigate because they have another paid solution to do so. It would be nice to integrate the security and the anti-spam (i.e. the fake links, etc.) along with the Exchange Online default."

"I don't like it in general. It sort of has that Microsoft flavor to it, which is just the style they use and the way they color things and lay them out."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"In the next release, I would like to see more features added to the security of the solution."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"The solution costs $12 to $16 per user per month."

"I would give the cost a five out of ten."

"The subscription fee is monthly."

"Our organization pays for a corporate license to use the solution."

"We bought some licenses, and some are within our package or partnership with Microsoft."

"The price is not competitive."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The product is very cheap."