Microsoft Exchange Online vs ProtonMail comparison

"It's easy to use and there is more integration."

"The user experience is very fantastic for Microsoft Exchange Online currently; I am satisfied with the integrations available with other Microsoft products, and Microsoft Exchange Online has great security features and the spam filters work super fine."

"A good investment."

"Tech support has been great, when necessary."

"The benefits are widespread and effective communication. We use Microsoft Teams for meetings within and outside our organization. Additionally, Teams can be used for chat, allowing us to track communication and see user activity"

"Intuitive and easy to use."

"Microsoft Exchange Online has great functionality."

"It's pretty reliable. We haven't had any issues with it."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Exchange Online."

"What I don't like about Microsoft Exchange Online is too much integration because now it has many services connected to it. In the beginning, it was just email, and now it's also Teams and Visio, and many other services which I don't like. Microsoft Exchange Online should focus on one service. The product now lost focus, and this is its area for improvement. I would also like more freedom in choosing to use just one service, for example, just Microsoft Exchange Online, which means I don't need Teams or any other Microsoft product or service there. Right now, all services are either in the Microsoft Office suite, or there are more products or services integrated with Microsoft Exchange Online, and I'd like to just focus on one."

"When we need to purchase additional licenses for additional users, the process is slow."

"The solution’s technical support could be improved."

"The ActiveSync services and the mapping services could be improved."

"For non-technical people, some configurations might be a little bit difficult. We can use it on our laptops or our portable devices like mobiles and others gadgets, but we have had repeated problems with syncing. That is, when using different gadgets and devices, there are issues with syncing. The configuration could definitely be improved."

"We'd like to see more integration with other platforms."

"Migration can be an issue if you do not have a good audit process."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is a bit more expensive than other solutions."

"The solution costs $12 to $16 per user per month."

"I would give the cost a five out of ten."

"The price is not competitive."

"There is an annual enterprise subscription to use Microsoft Exchange Online. The price is reasonable."

"I pay approximately $120 or $150 per year, and as long as I pay that amount, they will do regular updates so that I always have the most recent and greatest version of the application."

"The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements."