We performed a comparison between OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB and ServiceNow CMDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Configuration Management Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can discover almost everything and creates relationship among discovered CIs, along with creating topology modeling."
"The auto-discovery feature is great."
"It scales easily with future expansion."
"It can discover various pieces from hardware, software, custom applications, and tie them together to create a map using ASM."
"Precision, trustworthiness, reconciliation, and user-friendly presentation are the key features I value most."
"The product is easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the discovery."
"It is a dependable source of data. If I want to understand what technologies are used to deliver certain business outcomes, this is what I would use. I can know that this particular server is being used to deliver this business application or business service."
"The different tables are available in ServiceNow CMDB are quite good. We don't need to create many custom tables."
"ServiceNow excels in integration and is considered the best tool in the market for this purpose."
"ServiceNow CMDB works great for large and small businesses."
"I like ServiceNow CMDB's discovery tools. If you have discovery tools and the discovery tools are built around a philosophy of mapping, then we can implement a top-down architectural mapping of the elements in the upper structure and create your CI."
"There is a lot of documentation online regarding CMDB."
"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow is the user interface because you can customize or configure it directly from the user interface by using the mouse. It is easy to use even for non-IT people. You can also directly plug your ServiceNow instance within your Microsoft Active Directory and then retrieve all your users and groups. So, you can use the users and groups to put automation inside the application. When you have new hires, you can automate the group security and group attribution. It is very good in terms of performance. Its performance is almost 100%. Once, it took less than two minutes to back up and run an instance. It has very good reliability."
"Making it simpler to set up and understand would be a big improvement."
"The implementation could be simplified."
"When we work in an environment, the production environment continuously changes and at that time we should have knowledge about the new server (node). However, the auto-discovery part should automatically discover the new CI (node/servers) in an environment and inform the IT person."
"The page loading is very slow."
"Improve the GUI and documentation."
"An area for improvement in ServiceNow is the reporting because there are reporting features that would be better when done within the platform, rather than having to buy the performance analytics model. There is so much difference between the dashboarding that you can do from the platform versus what's on the performance analytics model. Some of the features currently available within performance analytics would be good to have within the platform because sometimes, customers will say that the tool is okay, but it's not enough, so you'll need to go with the performance analytics model, and that's costly."
"Because I'm a SME, the most important thing is the technical help that I can get, so better, more useful technical support would be good."
"Integration is complicated and requires advance scripting and customization to complete it. It would be good to have the ability to customize the UI."
"The discovery process and service mapping could be improved."
"If you select any CI, the associated applications with that CI should also be made available for users since, currently, the tool lacks such a feature."
"There's room for improvement in terms of integration."
"In general, the pain points are related to ServiceNow. There is a lack of development. ServiceNow is not a true configuration management tool. So, a lot of development is needed to get it to be the kind of tool that you would like it to be. It serves as a platform, and you only get out of it what you invest in terms of development. So, CMDB on its own isn't quite robust until you actually have a CMD project to make it robust. The same thing is there with asset management and all other parts of it. Out of the box, it's not competitive with a like-for-like application."
"When running large queries within the system, it does have a tendency to bog down the system. This is something that should be improved. I would also like to see the HAM Pro module beefed up a little bit and integrated better into the SAM Pro module, which seems to be pretty much on the roadmap. Its pricing is pretty complicated and always fluctuating. Its pricing should be improved."
More OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is ranked 4th in Configuration Management Databases with 11 reviews while ServiceNow CMDB is ranked 1st in Configuration Management Databases with 31 reviews. OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow CMDB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB writes "Secure with a quick setup and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow CMDB writes "It has helped us consolidate information, improving reporting and visibility". OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow CMDB is most compared with BMC Atrium CMDB, Device42 and IBM Tivoli CMDB. See our OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB vs. ServiceNow CMDB report.
See our list of best Configuration Management Databases vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.