Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ServiceNow CMDB Logo

ServiceNow CMDB Reviews

Vendor: ServiceNow
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is ServiceNow CMDB?

Featured ServiceNow CMDB reviews

ServiceNow CMDB mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of ServiceNow CMDB in the Configuration Management Databases category stands at 26.0%, down from 38.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ServiceNow CMDB26.0%
Device4226.5%
Faddom9.8%
Other37.7%
Configuration Management Databases

PeerResearch reports based on ServiceNow CMDB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryConfiguration Management DatabasesMar 16, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 16, 2026Download
ComparisonServiceNow CMDB vs Device42Mar 16, 2026Download
ComparisonServiceNow CMDB vs Qualys VMDRMar 16, 2026Download
ComparisonServiceNow CMDB vs OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDBMar 16, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Qualys VMDR4.25.0%94%96 interviewsAdd to research
Device424.226.5%100%33 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business76
Midsize Enterprise29
Large Enterprise144
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Security Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare ServiceNow CMDB with alternative products

Learn more about ServiceNow CMDB

ServiceNow CMDB customers

Related questions

 
ServiceNow CMDB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
ServiceNow Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees4.0No summary available
Consultant at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5No summary available
Configuration Manager at Adtalem Global Education4.5We utilize ServiceNow CMDB for asset management and task automation, integrating it with EDR solutions for incident support. Though effective, it poses a steep learning curve for beginners, necessitating more training or self-guided courses to enhance usability.
Senior Business Analyst at State Goverment Organization3.5ServiceNow CMDB effectively manages Configuration Items (CIs) within an organization's IT landscape, offering a centralized repository. Its user-friendly interface and customization options are advantageous, though further customization enhancements and empowerment of power users could improve functionality.
Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5We primarily use ServiceNow for asset management and integrate our on-prem and cloud inventory into its CMDB. While its automation features are valuable, improvements are needed in defining SLAs and logical mapping beyond the OS layer.
Configuration Manager at Adtalem Global Education3.5No summary available
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I use ServiceNow CMDB for handling incidents, problems, and change management, as well as managing equipment inventories and infrastructure. Its most valuable feature is tracking changes to CIs, but it lacks the ability to view associated applications directly.
Senior Analyst at DXC Technology4.5I use ServiceNow CMDB for incident management, request management, service mapping, and discovery. Its single data model and tree structure are valuable, though performance issues arise with excessive configurations. Adding more tables helps provide detailed insights.