OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma comparison

OpenText and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Sciforma is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 4.4% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

2,041 Views
1,000 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

1,498 Views
689 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Sciforma are two competing products in the project management software category. Sciforma takes the lead with its advanced features, catering to complex project needs, while OpenText is noted for its strong support and competitive pricing.

Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides customizable dashboards, focusing on aligning projects with organizational goals, and seamless integration capabilities. Sciforma offers advanced resource management, real-time analytics designed for diverse project portfolios, and a feature-rich environment ideal for large-scale management scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides a streamlined deployment process with responsive support for quick integration. Sciforma offers extensive deployment options, cloud and on-premise, with specialized customer service supporting intricate workflows.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is known for its lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users needing effective solutions. Sciforma demands a higher upfront investment, justified by returns from advanced capabilities and efficient project handling.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 4.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	4.4%
Sciforma	3.9%
Other	91.7%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Useful for resource and financial management but needs to change Oracle database

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on."

"PPM really has a powerful workflow and form engine that allows us to create workflow complexities and processes, with a good balance between flexibility and best practice that generally allows us to implement any kind of requirements a customer might have."

"It gives a more organized approach for managing the projects and helps us since many things can be automated using this tool, which were previously done manually."

"Demand, project, and time management parts are most valuable."

"Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products."

"Demand, project and time management parts of the tool are the most valuable."

"Customer service and technical support are excellent and great at helping us when needed."

"Able to manage multimillion projects and resources more effectively."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"ONE2TEAM revolutionizes the way of working: The cloud based solution for project and portfolio management with very strong collaboration functionality lets executives and team members access their work environment anytime, anywhere to monitor program status, act, and complete a personalized checklist of tasks without the need to send emails or create presentations, simply working together in a dashboard."

Cons

"Features such as the chargeback mechanism as well as managing various partners and cloud service providers needs to be improved."

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good."

"Program Management can be more functional to provide better program management."

"Better user interface. Usability in terms of better UX."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout."

"The user experience of the product needs to be improved"

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

13%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 10% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

monday.com vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

April 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

April 2026

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

One2team

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Intuitive interface: Provides a user-friendly design that simplifies navigation and operation.
Seamless integrations: Compatible with Microsoft Project and Jira, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Powerful modules: Includes time, demand, and resource management for effective control.
Real-time data visibility: Ensures accurate and timely insights for decision-making.
Customizable dashboards: Supports personalized views for improved project monitoring.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Enables modeling of various processes to fit specific business needs.
Comprehensive management: Aligns projects with business strategies.
Workflow automation: Reduces manual efforts, increasing efficiency.
Scenario comparison: Assists in evaluating different project outcomes.
Cost management: Provides extensive financial tools for better budgeting.

Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.

OpenText

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.