

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud); the analysis part is quite helpful, which is quite more descriptive than the other products.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) as it has led to time savings and a reduction in manual efforts while generating the load.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
The customer support for OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is very good.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
The marketplace community and forums are what we browse and look after, and we have found solutions whenever we tried to find anything.
I have not had the need to escalate questions to Selenium HQ tech support recently, as open community support is widely available and has been sufficient for our needs.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
The scalability of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is based on its cloud-native architecture, which demonstrates strong load handling capacity and stable protocol and script execution.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
We can execute thousands of test cases weekly, and our automation coverage using Selenium HQ is approximately eighty-five percent.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is a stable tool that demonstrates strong performance reliability.
Selenium HQ is a scalable solution; it has been in production for the last two years, but I have been working on it for the last six years, so it is definitely scalable.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
The database schema and everything, if they generate on the fly, that will be quite helpful, rather than creating it on our own.
In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial.
An automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.
I don't know if we have that capability to provide different data sources such as SQL Server, CSV, or maybe some other databases, so that kind of capability would be great.
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
The massive cloud scalability and fast design of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have helped me optimize performance, identify performance bottlenecks in my application, generate the traffic, and recognize performance reliability issues in my application.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well.
In the standalone LoadRunner analysis, I can merge graphs or set granular filters to obtain custom reports.
New features in Selenium HQ make object identification easier without reliance on XPath and CSS.
When we were doing these tests manually, it took several hours of effort, and those hours, when counted on the basis of person days, used to be maybe six or seven months of effort, which we can now do every day by running the pipeline.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 7.8% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 14.4% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 11.6% |
| Other | 66.2% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Selenium HQ | 4.2% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 9.8% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.2% |
| Other | 78.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
Selenium HQ, an open-source testing framework, is recognized for its ability to automate web testing across diverse environments. Its versatility in script customization and cross-browser support makes it a trusted tool for efficient automation testing.
Selenium HQ offers significant support for multiple browsers and programming languages, providing integration with CI tools and compatibility with frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users leverage its open-source nature for cost-effective testing and appreciate its scalability and flexibility for parallel execution. A vibrant community contributes to its continuous development. However, improvements are desired in performance-testing, parallel execution efficiency, and enhanced mobile device support. Users find it complex for those without development skills, with needs for better iOS automation and expanded reporting features.
What are the key features of Selenium HQ?Selenium HQ is widely adopted across industries for its comprehensive automation capabilities. Enterprises often employ it for UI and regression testing in web and mobile applications, integrating seamlessly with CI tools for a streamlined workflow. Its ability to automate API calls further enhances its utility across industry sectors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.