ManageEngine OpManager vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

ManageEngine and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while PICO is ranked #71. ManageEngine holds a 1.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

4,660 Views
4,427 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,809 Views
1,628 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Pico Corvil Analytics are competing in the network performance management space. ManageEngine OpManager holds the upper hand in pricing and support, while Pico Corvil Analytics excels in comprehensive features.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers versatile monitoring, real-time server monitoring, and customizable alerts. Pico Corvil Analytics provides advanced network insights, deep packet analysis, and user experience metrics.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its complex analytics tools, expand feature depth, and improve in-depth performance metrics. Pico Corvil Analytics can simplify deployment, offer more accessible documentation, and reduce dependence on expert assistance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager provides a straightforward deployment and accessible customer service suitable for limited IT resources. Pico Corvil Analytics involves a complex setup requiring customization and potentially expert assistance.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager has a competitive pricing structure focused on cost-effectiveness, offering positive ROI due to lower setup costs. Pico Corvil Analytics, with higher initial costs, offers substantial ROI driven by its detailed analytics and performance insights.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.9%
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.5%
Other	97.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Charles A

Deputy Director at Access Healthcare Services Pvt Ltd

Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement

Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"Alerting is the biggest asset as we can have real-time failure view and predict failures in some cases."

"ManageEngine OpManager has given us the ability to monitor real-time performance, and positions of our virtual machines and host machines, helping us minimize the amount of time it takes to manage them by allowing us to monitor all machines through a single dashboard instead of going to them one by one."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts, as the administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately, and this is the feature we value and use the most."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"ManageEngine OpManager allows us to manage all our organization's firewalls, switches, and critical servers from a single console, requiring only one person to oversee all operations."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"Corvil definitely delivers a performance advantage for our firm over our competition because we are able to address all issues on a near real-time basis."

"We're able to quickly drill down and find answers to events that are happening in real-time, using Corvil's analytics tools. That's the feature which is most in the spotlight..."

"My advice is "Go for it." It's an amazing product."

"Broadly speaking, this solution has reduced incident diagnosis times because it is a tool that we don't have elsewhere."

"Corvil is really useful, if you want to produce statistics for your application across different platforms then I would definitely recommend it."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices."

"The pricing of the solution is high."

"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view; when I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface and get confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint."

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."

"The dashboard could include more features."

"This product is little bit slow sometimes."

"The support of ManageEngine OpManager could improve. We had two issues and the support was not able to solve our issue."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"Sometimes, when you are saving any configuration and making changes, there are times something is missing. An error comes up, or sometimes there is no error, and the errors are not very straightforward as to the issue."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"It is perceived as an expensive option, even in the financial services sector."

"Corvil is pretty stable. We just have too much data going into the boxes. Because of that, it requires more maintenance than average."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

40%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 11% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

Statseeker vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Kaseya Traverse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

March 2026

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

OpManager

Corvil

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

March 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.