No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

KODAK Info Input Solution vs Nintex RPA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

KODAK Info Input Solution
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (8th)
Nintex RPA
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (21st)
 

Featured Reviews

NJ
System Manager at Beeble
Efficient data management enhances document processing capabilities and integration ease
The data extraction feature is what I prefer most about the KODAK Info Input Solution. I also appreciate the integrations, data validation, and onboarding process. In terms of using the solution's advanced data extraction capabilities, the manual entry during the extraction process makes it easy to extract data from documents, such as from email, scanner, or mobile devices, as well as cloud storage. The extraction of data may also occur on the APR systems, which helps extract the actual data and enter it in the system compared to manual data entry. This automation helps get data directly from other systems and ecosystems where data resides, allowing it to be imported into the same system, where it can be easily validated and directly linked to existing systems. The KODAK Info Input Solution collects data automatically, which saves time, unlike when someone has to enter data manually. It saves approximately 25% of time. Regarding integration with existing systems, KODAK Info Input Solution integrates with most services such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, as well as other tools such as Salesforce. This integration is easy, and these connectors are straightforward to configure, helping manage documents from all those services. It becomes easy because of its simple connections. The solution's intelligent automation feature is faster compared to other services. Because it is faster and works quickly, it becomes effortless to use the intelligent system since everything operates smoothly upon following commands. The multi-language support feature is particularly useful because some documents are sent and some onboarding processes are done in different languages, making it valuable to understand the documents sent. The multi-language support is important for ensuring compliance with various regulatory requirements because, with the system supporting multiple languages, users can translate various languages and access documents and services from different locations easily, accommodating team members from diverse backgrounds who may not speak English, such as those who only know Chinese or French.
JonathanNg - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows
To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The KODAK Info Input Solution's customer support is the best."
"What makes KODAK Info Input Solution perfect is that it has comprehensive capabilities, features, and tools including its own printers and scanners that can easily connect and share information."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution collects data automatically, which saves time, unlike when someone has to enter data manually."
"I rate KODAK Info Input Solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of KODAK Info Input Solution is the open intelligence piece, the ability to consume five different OCR engines."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution offers fast workflows for extracting information from even the largest documents."
"I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the software in our company, our system manager discussed it with us and we found the pricing to be reasonable, which is why we recommended it."
"By using KODAK Info Input Solution, we can scan the document, which automatically enters all details, allowing us to avoid mistakes in this way."
"Kryon RPA is very stable - we've not had many disruptions, and the product is updated regularly."
"This rate system has allowed us to be more responsive and competitive with our rates with less human involvement."
"The recording capability is valuable because of the amount of data it captures automatically. It's quite good. It means less development, and fewer configuration settings to fill in after you're done."
"We took a very complex business area, and every activity in it which can be done automatically is being replaced by the robot instead of people working on it."
"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."
"[One of the valuable features] is the triggers. It's relatively simple to activate it. You can activate it via Control-M or via email. It has a lot of built-in triggers which enable us to easily activate the jobs."
"The number of commands it gives us to edit and modify is really good. It also captures screen activities and plays them back."
"Operational efficiency has increased more than 50 to 60 percent."
 

Cons

"Integrating KODAK Info Input Solution with other software, such as Laserfiche, presents challenges due to inadequate documentation and an unintuitive web services interface."
"The most significant area for improvement in the KODAK Info Input Solution is its ability to support custom definitions and auto-learn."
"The most significant area for improvement in the KODAK Info Input Solution is its ability to support custom definitions and auto-learn."
"Integrating KODAK Info Input Solution with other software, such as Laserfiche, presents challenges due to inadequate documentation and an unintuitive web services interface."
"The only area I think KODAK Info Input Solution could improve on is making their user interface more user-friendly and offering full customer customization of features."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution can improve its connection with scanners. It connects most effectively with Kodak's own scanners, specifically the S S S SMAX Scanners, while connections with other brands, such as Epson or HP, can take more time."
"Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. Sometimes while connecting to the database, it shows errors, such as SQL login failed, your port is blocked, or not reachable."
"Kryon could be easier to use, especially in comparison to UiPath."
"We would like to see having a little more specific documentation, or some of the examples be easier to find. One of the big things that we get directed to now is the Kryon Community page, but a lot of that wasn't in existence or publicized when we started doing our training and education. Now, we're stumbling through using it. For the majority of the time, we have either had to try and interpret what the instructions meant or do a service desk ticket."
"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging."
"Kryon RPA's integration with other solutions could be more seamless."
"When a project is very big, a lot of memory is taken up."
"What needs improvement in Kryon RPA is the support. Sometimes, the solution has problems, so I contacted support, but I didn't receive immediate help from the team. You have to wait a while before the problem gets solved. This happens a few times in terms of getting cases solved. It would also be better if Kryon RPA had a cloud version because currently, from what I know, it only has an on-premise version, though I could be wrong about that. There isn't any additional feature I'd like added to Kryon RPA because it's a good service, but the support is very, very bad, so that area could be improved."
"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."
"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Although KODAK Info Input Solution's pricing is competitive within the industry's consumption-based model, its approach is overly complex."
"The pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution in Mexico is very expensive, and the government's purchasing process requires convincing many stakeholders."
"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."
"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."
"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."
"Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment."
"The price is affordable."
"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the software in our company, our system manager discussed it with us and we found the prici...
What needs improvement with KODAK Info Input Solution?
Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. When the document is not scanned properly, the accuracy problem arises. From old Xerox copies, if the handwriting is not clear...
What is your primary use case for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I will use KODAK Info Input Solution in our college for admissions processing. When many people come for admissions, I use this to scan their data and automatically store that record into my File E...
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.
What do you like most about Nintex RPA?
Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?
Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Kryon RPA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart
Find out what your peers are saying about KODAK Info Input Solution vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.