Kiteworks vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Kiteworks and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Kiteworks holds a 1.2% mindshare in ECM, compared to Oracle’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,947 Views
383 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews

1,088 Views
860 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Oracle Content Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Kiteworks and Oracle Content Management are competitors in the enterprise content management sector, both offering secure sharing and content collaboration solutions. Oracle Content Management might have an advantage with its comprehensive features compared to Kiteworks.

Features: Kiteworks focuses on robust security protocols, seamless third-party integrations, and data protection, making it suitable for industries requiring high compliance. Oracle Content Management provides a broader suite of content and digital asset management capabilities, enabling businesses to manage a variety of content types more effectively. Oracle offers expanded functionalities suitable for large-scale enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks emphasizes straightforward deployment with tailored solutions and dedicated support, making setup quick and efficient. Oracle Content Management may involve a more complex deployment due to its numerous features but offers comprehensive support to assist with challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks typically presents a more budget-friendly setup cost, focusing on essential features for a solid return on investment. Oracle Content Management may require a higher initial investment but offers expansive tools that could lead to greater ROI for businesses seeking extensive functionalities. The choice between these products depends on budget constraints versus the need for extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (29th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (10th)

Oracle Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Management Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.6%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Content Management	2.6%
Kiteworks	1.2%
Other	96.2%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

SanjeevKumar24

Principal Data Scientist at Tata Consultancy

Built-in integrations increase efficiency but cluster support requires improvement

On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environment, improvements are ongoing. The fallback and benefit assessment of the product suggest a need for a rating of seven or eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"Scalability is impressive."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

More Kiteworks pros

"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

Cons

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

More Kiteworks cons

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."

"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

12%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 16% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 20% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 17% of the time

Alfresco vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 10% of the time

Hyland Perceptive Content vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

January 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

January 2026

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Oracle Content Management report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.