Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle Content Management Logo

Top 10 Oracle Content Management Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.1 out of 5
358 followers
Start review

Top Oracle Content Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Content Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, and IBM FileNet. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Content Management surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, advanced security features, and AI-powered content recommendations that enhance user collaboration and streamline digital asset management for an unparalleled content experience.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
SharePoint integrates smoothly within Microsoft, offering cost-effective document management and collaboration for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Oracle Content Management provides superior scalability and security, ideal for larger businesses requiring robust content management and willing to invest in long-term benefits.
Download Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint Report
SharePoint offers a more economical setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which requires a higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs reflect contrasting financial commitments for enterprises when choosing between these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
SharePoint offers a more economical setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which requires a higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs reflect contrasting financial commitments for enterprises when choosing between these platforms.
Oracle Content Management Logo
Oracle Content Management Logo
OpenText Extended ECM
3.9 out of 5

Oracle Content Management excels with cloud integration and flexible collaboration. In comparison, OpenText Extended ECM offers extensive enterprise application integration. Oracle appeals with rapid deployment and support, while OpenText caters to large enterprises through long-term strategic benefits and comprehensive documentation.

Download OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management Report
Oracle Content Management has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Extended ECM, offering a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Content Management has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Extended ECM, offering a more cost-effective initial investment.
Oracle Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
IBM FileNet excels in workflow automation and compliance, attracting enterprises needing backend strength. In comparison, Oracle Content Management focuses on usability, offering seamless integration and advanced collaboration, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing agility and scalable cloud solutions for quick ROI.
Download IBM FileNet vs. Oracle Content Management Report
IBM FileNet has higher setup costs compared to Oracle Content Management, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM FileNet has higher setup costs compared to Oracle Content Management, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Oracle Content Management Logo
Oracle Content Management Logo
Adobe Experience Manager
4.0 out of 5
Adobe Experience Manager excels in customization with tools for web content management and user engagement. In comparison, Oracle Content Management offers strong Oracle ecosystem integration and efficient asset management, appealing to enterprises seeking streamlined cloud solutions within existing Oracle applications.
Download Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle Content Management Report
Adobe Experience Manager's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its extensive features, while Oracle Content Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, emphasizing ease of entry.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Experience Manager's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its extensive features, while Oracle Content Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, emphasizing ease of entry.
Oracle Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
Oracle Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
Alfresco offers a cost-effective, flexible platform suitable for businesses seeking customization, with workflow automation and collaboration features. In comparison, Oracle Content Management excels with enterprise-scale integrations and advanced security, catering to those prioritizing comprehensive features despite higher setup costs.
Download Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management Report
Alfresco offers a straightforward setup cost structure, making it accessible for smaller businesses, while Oracle Content Management tends to have higher initial setup costs, reflecting its enterprise-grade features and scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
Alfresco offers a straightforward setup cost structure, making it accessible for smaller businesses, while Oracle Content Management tends to have higher initial setup costs, reflecting its enterprise-grade features and scalability options.
Oracle Content Management Logo
Oracle Content Management Logo
OpenText Content Manager
3.8 out of 5
OpenText Content Manager appeals with cost-effective pricing and robust support, especially excelling in document management and security. In comparison, Oracle Content Management attracts tech buyers with advanced features and AI-driven insights, delivering value in integration within Oracle's ecosystem despite higher costs.
Download OpenText Content Manager vs. Oracle Content Management Report
OpenText Content Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Content Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Oracle Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
IBM ECM offers competitive pricing and strong support for organizations prioritizing workflow automation and document management. In comparison, Oracle Content Management's advanced analytics and AI capabilities attract buyers seeking deeper insights and intelligent content experiences, justifying its higher cost with scalable cloud solutions.
Download IBM ECM vs. Oracle Content Management Report
IBM ECM has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM ECM has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Content Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

Related categories

Enterprise Content Management
Document Management Software
Web Content Management