Oracle Content Management vs SharePoint comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 2.5% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 16.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Content Management

Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews

878 Views
746 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 160 SharePoint reviews

9,734 Views
4,478 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Oracle Content Management are enterprise content management platforms. SharePoint often edges out in pricing and support, while Oracle excels in advanced features.

Features: SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office, supports document management, and automates workflows. Oracle Content Management offers advanced AI capabilities, broad integration options, and a versatile content management feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint ensures straightforward deployment in the Microsoft ecosystem with excellent support. Oracle, though requiring a complex setup, provides powerful deployment options with robust support for intricate implementations.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint is known for cost-effective setups with high ROI in Microsoft environments. Oracle may have higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI through its rich features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,452 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Management Software (10th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

160

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 16.4%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies Kenya

Improves efficiency and offers reliability along with good flexibility

I have used Oracle in different places, especially in the IT industry, for several years since 2009. I have been in the IT industry for a long period of time. I have had a chance to interact with many systems, and I have been in touch with several programming languages, including the ones in Oracle. As a developer, I use Oracle Content Management as an enterprise tool to enable development. The solution's integration capabilities are doing very well because I work with many of them, and its APIs are flexible, good, and secure. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Madhur D'silva

Lead Consultant at Eviden

Collaborative work benefits while user-friendliness challenges persist

The most valuable feature of SharePoint ( /products/sharepoint-reviews ) is its user interface, which is very easy to use. I do not have to be very technical to use it. Its rights management capabilities and ability to restrict access to certain people are also very useful. Furthermore, I can access SharePoint from any device, whether it is a phone or laptop, which is very convenient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."

"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."

"SharePoint is a ten out of ten solution."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."

"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."

"Ability to store files of any type."

"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."

"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."

"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."

"The solution should improve its integration with other project management tools."

"We would like more security features, like automating."

"Microsoft support could be better, especially for enterprise troubleshooting. They require a lot of logs and often rely on online support, which does not meet customer expectations."

"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."

"The web parts in SharePoint could be more intuitive for end users."

"When working on a website with SharePoint Online, not many people can edit simultaneously. If I am editing one section, my colleague cannot edit it at the same time."

"The technical support process should be more streamlined as it usually involves contacting vendors and arranging calls for resolution."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"The pricing works for us."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"It is very expensive."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.

See all answers

What do you like most about SharePoint?

The search feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

As SharePoint is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, the pricing is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

The web parts in SharePoint could be more intuitive for end users. Many do not fully understand these features, and improving user awareness could foster better data relations. The learning curve o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 23% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 23% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 6% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 9% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon WorkDocs vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

WordPress vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

July 2025

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

June 2025

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.