KiSSFLOW vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

KiSSFLOW and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. KiSSFLOW is ranked #25, while Workiva is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. KiSSFLOW holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of KiSSFLOW users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

KiSSFLOW

Read 12 KiSSFLOW reviews

1,538 Views
246 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,348 Views
657 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

KiSSFLOW

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

KiSSFLOW and Workiva Wdesk offer solutions for optimizing business processes and data management. KiSSFLOW excels in automation and simplicity, while Workiva Wdesk is favored for its comprehensive feature set for data management.

Features: KiSSFLOW enhances efficiency with automation, seamless task assignments, and simplicity in adapting to various business needs. Workiva Wdesk offers advanced data management tools, with strong compliance, reporting, and audit features, making it ideal for data-heavy applications.

Room for Improvement: KiSSFLOW could enhance its data handling capabilities, offer more advanced reporting tools, and improve integration with external services. Workiva Wdesk might benefit from a more user-friendly interface, simplified initial setup procedures, and reduced resource requirements for smaller projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW offers a straightforward deployment process with excellent customer support, making it appealing for businesses needing swift solutions. Workiva Wdesk provides strong customer support but requires more extensive training due to its intricate deployment model, suitable for companies investing in thorough onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: KiSSFLOW stands out for its cost-effective approach and efficient ROI for smaller enterprises seeking operational efficiency with limited budgets. Workiva Wdesk, though more expensive initially, justifies the cost with robust features and a significant long-term ROI for businesses prioritizing comprehensive data management.

To learn more, read our detailed KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KiSSFLOW

Ranking in Business Performance Management

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (36th), Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Low-Code Development Platforms (28th)

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

11th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (8th), Financial Close Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 1.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Workiva Wdesk	3.2%
KiSSFLOW	1.6%
Other	95.2%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Julius Jagdon

Business Tools at Motorola Solutions

The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver

When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Read full review

reviewer2510292

Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding

The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is very, very good."

"I like the forms which help us to get information."

"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

"The support team responds fast."

"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."

"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."

"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."

More KiSSFLOW pros

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

Cons

"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."

"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."

"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."

"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."

"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."

"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."

"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."

"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."

More KiSSFLOW cons

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"The speed must be improved."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."

"The license is very expensive."

"The product costs $15 per user per month."

"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."

"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 9% of the time

Unqork vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 7% of the time

Camunda vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 6% of the time

More KiSSFLOW Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 13% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

OneStream XF vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW

January 2026

Download KiSSFLOW product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

January 2026

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wdesk

Overview

KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.

KiSSFLOW

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Free Report: KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KiSSFLOW vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.