OneStream XF vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

OneStream and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. OneStream is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.5, while Workiva is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. OneStream holds a 4.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OneStream users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

OneStream XF

Read 5 OneStream XF reviews

1,085 Views
857 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,174 Views
565 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

OneStream XF

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Workiva Wdesk and OneStream XF are competing in the enterprise solution market. OneStream XF appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and customer investment in integration and analytics.

Features: Workiva Wdesk offers intuitive document management, integrated compliance solutions, and real-time collaboration, making it ideal for agile reporting needs. OneStream XF is focused on comprehensive financial consolidation, performance management, and analytics, providing a strong solution for financial management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workiva Wdesk provides seamless cloud-based deployment and excellent customer service, enabling rapid project initiation. OneStream XF, though requiring a more complex setup due to its powerful functionalities, offers dedicated support for implementation and comprehensive integration.

Pricing and ROI: Workiva Wdesk features a straightforward pricing model with lower initial costs and quicker ROI due to its cloud-native implementation. OneStream XF requires higher upfront investment but offers significant long-term ROI with its extensive financial management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneStream XF

Ranking in Business Performance Management

7th

Ranking in Financial Close Software

3rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

11th

Ranking in Financial Close Software

5th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of OneStream XF is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OneStream XF	4.5%
Workiva Wdesk	3.0%
Other	92.5%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Andy Jorgensen

Chief Revenue Officer at MindStream Analytics

Customer satisfaction and data integration shine in multinational consolidations

The best features of OneStream XF are threefold. The first is Extensible Dimensionality, which allows for different levels of detail depending on the task. When budgeting for 2026, Extensible Dimensionality enables detailed breakdowns of supplies into specific items such as printer paper and magic markers. When actuals arrive, that level of detail isn't necessary. This flexibility in collecting and reporting data is a significant advantage. OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything. Users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup. OneStream XF shows a strong commitment to customer success. While 100% satisfaction is unrealistic, OneStream XF puts in substantial effort to ensure clients are successful, which contrasts sharply with experiences from companies such as SAP. OneStream XF's data integration capabilities with ERP and HCM systems are excellent, thanks to its history. The founders of OneStream XF were the creators of Upstream, which specialized in data integration. When they developed OneStream XF, they implemented that expertise, making it excel at data integration.

Read full review

Phillip Gough

Partner, Financial Services at Deloitte TT

The solution is easy to deploy and enables collaboration, but it must improve its speed and enable users to create pivot tables

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The initial setup was straightforward. The solution is cloud-based. We deployed the product along with Wdata in six months. It was for a lot of use cases. To deploy the tool, we designed the use cases and developed them. Then, we went through unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. It was an Agile delivery cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking."

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."

"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything; users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

Cons

"It's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it."

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

"There are longstanding challenges with OneStream XF, particularly around the technical aspects that require scripting skills, typically managed by finance departments."

"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"The speed must be improved."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."

"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Seeking lightweight open source BI software

I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.

See all answers

What do you like most about OneStream XF?

It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneStream XF?

My experience with the price has been okay. It's something that, when part of a larger system, we need to use, and there are also some discounts related to our multi-country usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

CCH Tagetik vs OneStream XF

Compared 15% of the time

Anaplan vs OneStream XF

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs OneStream XF

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle HFM vs OneStream XF

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs OneStream XF

Compared 6% of the time

More OneStream XF Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 21% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 9% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF

October 2025

Download OneStream XF product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

October 2025

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wdesk

Overview

Financial Close, Consolidation and Reporting
Automate the financial close; reduce time waiting for data loads and refreshing of reports throughout the month. Access accurate and secure financial and operational information from any data source.

OneStream

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk

November 2025

Free Report: OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneStream XF vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors and best Financial Close Software vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.