We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on our users’ reviews, SentinelOne is a stronger, more secure solution. SentinelOne offers a deeper and more robust level of security. Additionally, SentinelOne provides consistent protection across Windows, Linux, and macOS. It can also support legacy infrastructures as well as many newer environments. The single-pane feature helps protect numerous endpoints with a lean team, saving time and money and improving TCO and ROI. Users are also happier with SentinelOne’s pricing.
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The admin capabilities are great."
"I like how it protects the network and all the endpoints."
"It is very efficient. I like its simplicity."
"The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"Easy to deploy, easy to use, and has a good detection rate."
"This solution is stable."
"It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
"The most valuable feature of Singularity Complete is the Ranger function."
"Sentinel One has improved our organization by protecting the environment we are working in."
"The offline protection offered by SentinelOne Singularity Complete for my devices is valuable."
"The Deep Visibility feature is the most useful part of the EDR platform. It gives us good insights into what is actually happening on the endpoints, e.g., when we have malicious or suspicious activity. We came from a legacy type AV previously, so we didn't have that level of visibility or understanding. For simplifying threat-hunting, it is extremely useful, where traditional techniques in threat hunting are quite laborious. We can put in indicators of compromise and it will sweep the environment for them, then they would give us a breakdown of what assets have been seen and where they have been seen, which is more of a forensics overview."
"The autonomous platform is valuable because we can separate false positives and negatives."
"The detection rate for Sentinel One has been excellent and we have been able to resolve many potential threats with zero client impact. The ability to deploy via our RMM allows us to quickly secure new clients and provides peace of mind."
"The best feature of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is that you don't need to configure a lot with it because it provides an unmatched layer of protection out of the box."
"The Storyline feature has significantly affected our incident response time. Originally, what would take us hours, now it takes us several minutes."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution is not stable."
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The performance level could be better."
"This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced."
"As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay."
"Malware protection for Kaspersky should be revolutionized, where they no longer work with signatures, but with more advanced ways of detecting malware, such as Cylance or Traps from Palo Alto."
"I'd like to see them improve encryption and remote management in the future. Kaspersky could also improve its scanning technology. Other solutions have adopted machine learning and deep learning, but Kaspersky still uses signature-based scanning."
"The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors."
"The installation is technical. You need to be certified."
"It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users."
"The UI appears to be flat, and I wish to have the ability to customize it with features and buttons that are tailored to our needs."
"In the beginning, we had some issues with their product on some of the Windows 32-bit operating systems."
"One of the things they could do is extend the product range to include Android and iPhone so that you could have the app on your phone as well. There is probably something going on there with that, but that's something that they're lacking at the moment. For instance, if I was to have to recommend a client to protect their phone, I'd have to recommend Norton or something else. I don't have an answer within the SentinelOne solution."
"Improvements for SentinelOne's Singularity Complete could include adjusting pricing for specific markets, ensuring affordability, and better alignment with customer expectations in those regions."
"We did use the Ranger functionality. However, there was some scanning going on and it caused a lot of noise, so we had to disable it."
"SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved."
"Maybe they can develop some firewall aspects for it to better protect us."
"The documentation provided for implementation is not adequate and has caused us challenges."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 110 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.