Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Logpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.9
Kaspersky Endpoint Security offers cost-effective protection, easy setup, reduced admin needs, and aids in quick recovery from incidents.
Sentiment score
6.7
Logpoint ensures compliance, cost predictability, and security, offering 40% ROI and fulfilling Department of Defense contract needs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Kaspersky's customer service is praised, but technical support receives mixed reviews; paid options and external vendors offer varied effectiveness.
Sentiment score
7.3
Logpoint's customer service is improving, but response times and communication barriers lead to varied user experiences worldwide.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
Group CIO at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable and adaptable, with challenges in network configurations and large-scale updates for bigger deployments.
Sentiment score
7.2
LogPoint's modular design ensures effective scalability across enterprise environments, integrating seamlessly and handling growth efficiently with high user ratings.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
Group CIO at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is stable and reliable, with resource demands occasionally causing performance issues, yet generally satisfied users.
Sentiment score
6.4
Logpoint offers stable performance on adequate hardware but faces issues with limited resources, occasional bugs, and diverse log handling.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Kaspersky Endpoint Security users seek improvements in device control, performance, integration, user interface, and pricing adjustments.
Logpoint faces challenges in integration, user experience, and support, requiring improvements in detection, deployment, and interface customization.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
Cybersecurity Product Consultant at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Group CIO at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Setup Cost

Kaspersky Endpoint Security's pricing is competitive and cost-effective, with discounts for volume, though some extras may increase costs.
Logpoint offers affordable, transparent pricing with fixed and subscription options, remaining competitive compared to other SIEM solutions.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Valuable Features

Kaspersky Endpoint Security offers comprehensive, scalable protection with real-time updates, high detection rates, and seamless integration across platforms.
Logpoint excels with advanced logging, user-friendly interface, cost-effective pricing, and integrates UEBA and SOAR in one package.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
Cybersecurity Product Consultant at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
Security Solutions Architect at Systems Engineering of Egypt
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
Group CIO at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller
Exabeam's advantage is its AI-driven network AI; this AI feature is available, and Exabeam is powerful.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
124
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (8th), Endpoint Compliance (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (12th)
Logpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
35th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (29th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (14th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 1.9%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business1.9%
Logpoint0.4%
Other97.7%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

SR
Group CIO at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
Have maintained strong endpoint protection through behavioral analysis and daily monitoring
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern. I think they could add it in the future; however, antivirus cannot provide a proper DLP solution, but they can offer a mix of DLP, similar to Trend Micro Apex One, which provides some sort of DLP file management. Nonetheless, we need a proper DLP solution such as Forcepoint or Symantec, whichever suits us. We'll be conducting performance evaluation in the next quarter while working on other projects. More value means a better GUI, user interface, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. In Sophos, we receive a daily system-generated report about what is happening, plus an alert system. The reporting system in Trend Micro is also excellent; I receive an email every day at 10:00 AM with a report for the last 24 hours.
Rifat Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication
I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business63
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern. I think they could add it in the future; however, antivirus cannot provide a pro...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
What needs improvement with LogPoint?
I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My compan...
What is your primary use case for LogPoint?
I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Logpoint and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.