We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Check Point Harmony is the winner in this comparison. It is a powerful and flexible solution that is easy to deploy. Kaspersky does come out on top in the pricing category, however.
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"I have found the Zero phishing and IPS features the most useful in Check Point Harmony Endpoint. Additionally, threat emulation sandboxing is effective."
"They have a great knowledge base that you can leverage as a user."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint has one of the most user-friendly dashboards I've seen."
"We are able to manage all our endpoints from a single cloud console."
"It's easy to scale as needed."
"The license plans are also very nice and distributed - allowing for a separation between types of users with more basic or more advanced options."
"Data security analytics enable us to prepare and take suitable precautions before landing in trouble and exposing confidential information."
"The solution has all the standard features you would expect for endpoint protection."
"The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us."
"The stability has been good."
"There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well."
"I am impressed with the tool's main dashboard, anti-malware application blocking, DDoS, etc."
"The initial setup was fairly simple, taking only a few minutes."
"It's easy to use."
"I like the security that this solution provides."
"The solution has been quite stable."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"It would be ideal if they had a migration tool of some sort."
"The web filter service could be improved."
"I have a few issues when attempting to install Harmony on some of the machines."
"They could improve memory consumption."
"They could be focused on the analysis of USB devices."
"The product updates are a manual process for my administrator and can take several hours out of his day."
"Specifically, there are gaps when it comes to security."
"The only thing that our customers want, is lower prices."
"They're restricted to endpoint protection for now, I'd like to see some additional products."
"There are times when Microsoft Windows's antivirus called Defender interferes with the functionality of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There should be better integration with Windows."
"It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users."
"The performance is not very good."
"I've had some problems with the web interface. For example, when I was running a trace, it's difficult to find this function, but I can see it when I go on the server. So, if I want to implement the EDR functions on the web interface, it's very difficult because the command button or the link doesn't appear."
"It's grown more expensive and customers are not happy about it."
"The solution could use better reporting."
"I'd like to see them improve encryption and remote management in the future. Kaspersky could also improve its scanning technology. Other solutions have adopted machine learning and deep learning, but Kaspersky still uses signature-based scanning."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 7th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 46 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 10th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 30 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Resilient by design, provides redundancy, and offers ongoing constant improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "It's reliable and secure, but the monitoring and notifications could be more detailed ". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Fortinet FortiClient. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors and best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.