

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform both compete in the cybersecurity sector, particularly in endpoint protection. ThreatLocker seems to have an upper hand due to its extensive zero-trust features and strong support system.
Features: Kaspersky offers comprehensive threat response tools, a cloud console for remote isolation, system hardening, encryption, and patch management. ThreatLocker provides ring-fencing capabilities, application control, and extensive allowlisting features, emphasizing zero trust with granular application and system control.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky could improve by integrating internet protection, enhancing uninstallation, and offering better UI and scalability. Enhanced incident visibility and managed detection services are also desired. ThreatLocker could benefit from flexible training, improved UI, better network saturation management during policy updates, and support timing improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky is mostly deployed on-premises and private clouds, with mixed support reviews. ThreatLocker offers flexibility across on-prem, hybrid, and public clouds. It is known for its ease of use and generally quick and comprehensive support, though response times could be better.
Pricing and ROI: Pricing for both is reasonable. Kaspersky's subscription model is seen as affordable with significant ROI by maintaining security and business continuity. ThreatLocker provides fair pricing with flexibility, adding substantial value to security operations, considered a financially sound investment.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
For technical support, Kaspersky provides two kinds: purchased support for real-time assistance and normal support during working hours.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum can expand from Endpoint Detection and Response to Extended Detection and Response and then threat intelligence solutions.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
I would rate stability for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum as nine; it is pretty stable, a very good, stable product.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 1.1% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.