We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."In a PC environment, it is quite stable."
"The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The solution is very powerful and the underlying structure of it is well done. The company behind the solution is very open as far as their whole ecosystem is concerned. They also do a lot of work in the training area."
"The solution has good reporting and is very user-friendly."
"The workflows are the most valuable feature of the solution, whether for tasks, bugs, or chain requests from the site. I also like the solution's GUI, which is easy to navigate for everyone."
"The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"The documentation is very well done."
"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."
"There is room for improvement in terms of scalability."
"JIRA and Confluence must be linked automatically."
"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."
"The reporting and dashboard capabilities have room for improvement."
"The team-centric view is slightly weaker in JIRA compared to its competitors, especially considering how I can evaluate how each resource has been placed, not just in one project but across JIRA."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Asana, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Meridian Proliance PPM and Planview PPM Pro.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
