OpenText ProVision vs iServer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Orbus Software Logo
3,385 views|1,410 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
214 views|137 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iServer and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ProVision vs. iServer Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time.""The solution has wide use within Microsoft products. The integration with Microsoft products, and, in particular, Microsoft Office, is great.""The solution is easily modified to suit your needs.""The most valuable features of iServer are the integration with Microsoft Office and the interface is similar to Microsoft applications making them easy to use.""Integrating the Microsoft documents to the product and visualization matrix where we can see the end-to-end relationship of the network is of great importance to our company.""We like the governance.""The product has a valuable customized model.""Good and effective reporting features, which help in decision making."

More iServer Pros →

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.""The stability of the product is very good.""All the features come as part of a standard license."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

Cons
"Cannot see which activities are control activities.""The modelling needs improvement, specifically forecasting capabilities and scenarios.""The migration tool needs to be included in the main package, and not as a separate license.""I haven't used this solution long enough to know what areas could be improved.""Requirements management needs to be improved.""It runs relatively slowly.""It definitely needs help to improve the visual aspect of the solution.""We could allocate permissions to use only specific components to the users rather than the entire instance."

More iServer Cons →

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments.""Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost."
  • "It's about 13K to set up and 9K for the license for three months. I think it's about 20K a year, but we haven't firmed up on pricing yet because the price depends on how long we commit to the solution."
  • "The price of iServer is reasonable compared to other solutions."
  • "They offer annual subscriptions for developing countries, which are not affordable for small or medium businesses."
  • "The product has a moderate pricing."
  • More iServer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management.
    Top Answer:They haven't introduced new features for the product's on-premise version since 2021, similar to the SaaS version. There could be features for process mining, process simulation, and analytics.
    Top Answer:We use the product for various critical functions within our environment, particularly in a government entity, where it assists in governance, workflow management, and generating reports and live… more »
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,385
    Comparisons
    1,410
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    214
    Comparisons
    137
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    5.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm ProVision
    Learn More
    Overview

    iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making.

    OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
    Sample Customers
    Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard
    Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    University10%
    Maritime Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization34%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    OpenText ProVision vs. iServer
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ProVision vs. iServer and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    iServer is ranked 6th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 15 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 24th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. iServer is rated 7.2, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of iServer writes "Enables flexible parameters for any process model and has a valuable document management feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". iServer is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, ARIS BPA and MEGA HOPEX, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our OpenText ProVision vs. iServer report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.