INTELLIBOT vs NTT-AT WinActor comparison

ServiceNow and NTT DATA are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ServiceNow is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.0, while NTT DATA is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. ServiceNow holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to NTT DATA’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of NTT DATA users who would recommend it.

INTELLIBOT

Read 8 INTELLIBOT reviews

609 Views
591 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews

481 Views
462 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

INTELLIBOT

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

NTT-AT WinActor and INTELLIBOT compete in the automation software market. INTELLIBOT appears to have the upper hand with advanced technological integrations and AI-driven capabilities, providing a strong appeal for users seeking cutting-edge solutions, despite NTT-AT's strengths in customer support and pricing.

Features: NTT-AT WinActor includes robust integration capabilities, customizable workflows, and easy adaptation to various industries. INTELLIBOT is known for AI-driven automation, seamless cloud integration, and advanced technological integrations distinguishing it in the market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: INTELLIBOT benefits from streamlined cloud-based deployment and remote customer support. NTT-AT WinActor provides on-premise solutions with extensive training programs. While INTELLIBOT offers quicker deployment, NTT-AT emphasizes thorough training and support.

Pricing and ROI: NTT-AT WinActor is cost-effective, minimizing setup costs for a feasible ROI strategy. INTELLIBOT demands a higher initial investment but proposes greater returns through enhanced operational efficiencies, attracting clients looking for long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

INTELLIBOT

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

29th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

27th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NTT-AT WinActor	0.7%
INTELLIBOT	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

AbhijitKelkar

Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico

Implementation successfully automates operations but support response requires improvement

There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow's product could improve by increasing its promotion. Customer support could also be improved, as they are slow to respond and appear to have policies that do not provide sufficient support for partners. They expect partners to be self-sufficient, which seems unusual for a product company.

Read full review

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"One of the most valuable features of INTELLIBOT is the scripting, which is commonly available with engineers."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

Cons

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow's product could improve by increasing its promotion."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Educational Organization

12%

Government

10%

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which lesser known RPA vendor has the best chance at unseating today's market leaders?

Intellibot.io would be my suggestion. From DPA to RPA to cognitive model long to Chatbots to IOT they have come a long way since inception. Within the short time they have rose to the top contende...

See all answers

What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?

There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews )'s product could improve by increasing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for INTELLIBOT?

I work as an implementation partner for ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews ), using INTELLIBOT ( /products/intellibot-reviews ) primarily for process automation.

See all answers

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?

The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?

The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?

For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manag...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Automate vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 30% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 29% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 21% of the time

Jiffy.ai Automate vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 21% of the time

More INTELLIBOT Competitors

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 32% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 22% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 18% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 15% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 14% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT

January 2026

Download INTELLIBOT product report

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Also Known As

No data available

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

Overview

Intellibot is a powerful RPA Platform that is designed to simplify the lifecycle of RPA deployments at every step of the process. Speed, reliability, ease of use and extensibility are at the heart of the platform architecture. Intellibot incorporates many next generation features that enable it to deliver on even the most complex RPA projects.

ServiceNow

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Exeo Tech Corporation

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

December 2025

Free Report: INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.