Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infobright DB vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
39th
Ranking in Data Warehouse
25th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
12th
Ranking in Data Warehouse
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (6th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 3.1%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

it_user708987 - PeerSpot reviewer
Excellent reporting server that is compatible with MySQL
We ran into some quirks that Infobright had. We interacted with Infobright's support and were able to resolve them. There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance). This would mean that redundancy is something you need to implement yourself.
Sushma Polavarapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges
We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"The security is great."
 

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The user interface could be improved."
"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."
"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."
"This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."
"It is an open-source product."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"The pricing is okay."
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"It’s an open-source solution."
"This is an open source solution."
"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

Infobright
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.