Infobright DB vs MySQL comparison

Ignite Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Ignite Technologies is ranked #37, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Ignite Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Ignite Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

172 Views
110 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,193 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and MySQL are direct competitors in the database market. MySQL is often considered superior due to its broad feature set and adaptability across diverse applications.

Features: Infobright DB is known for its columnar storage engine, data compression, and ability to efficiently handle large-scale analytics. It also allows the use of SQL language for queries. MySQL excels with a multi-threaded architecture, ACID compliance, and extensive compatibility with LAMP/WAMP stacks.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could improve in deployment simplicity and expanding community support. MySQL might enhance its scalability and performance in handling very large datasets while also refining its replication features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL is lauded for easy deployment and a strong community support network. Conversely, Infobright DB has a more complex deployment but serves specialized analytics needs effectively, often requiring expert guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB involves higher initial costs due to its analytics focus, yielding high ROI for data-intensive uses. MySQL offers a cost-effective structure, particularly with its open-source version, enabling broader use and better ROI for transactional applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. MySQL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. MySQL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (27th)

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Steve Dodge

Senior System Architect - Resiliency Engineering at AT&T

If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.

This version of Infobright has zero support for distributed scalability. The internal smart grid employed for each table has a major flaw in that the data size cannot be expunged until 2GB of data is reached at the column-level. This is a major flaw, making usage in a big-data scenario impossible. This means that you can delete as many records from a database table as you want. However, unless the 2GB aggregate size threshold was reached for some of the columns in the table, no reduction in disk space usage will occur. Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk. I spent countless hours trying to find some workaround for this. I have nightmares of my e-mail inbox full of unsolvable questions about data size reduction from our field engineers.

Read full review

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

"This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable."

"Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database."

"MySQL is easy and convenient for me. I don't need to rely on anyone. I can write the code and extract the information. It is fast if you know how to use it. The solution is not expensive, and most of the developers know how to use it. It is easy to create tables. The solution is stable and has good performance. The connection with AWS gives regular updates, which is manual otherwise and a nightmare."

"The installation process for the most scalable solution is remarkably quick, taking only a short amount of time."

"It has a lot of features. The RDBMS, consistency, and multi-user features are valuable."

"For sure, the solution is very stable."

"The solution helps us perform with our databases and extract data."

"For starters, it's free, which is always nice, and it's also pretty straightforward to use. It's a nice conventional database."

More MySQL pros

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar, which affects database performance."

"I would like to have features that allow us to jump between the cloud and our on-premises system."

"MySQL doesn't have the auto-clustering and database clustering features that other competitors provide. They can include these features."

"In an upcoming release, there should be something added similar to EPL. For example, when using the flow diagram, we can create a schema. We have two useful features to add or create the table, but there should be some UI features to allow us to drag and drop to create other schemas. This would be very helpful."

"MySQL has some unique exchange problems when it comes to migration projects."

"The documentation is pretty weak and should be improved."

"There should be an arrangement for end-users to get trained to use the tool...Improvement-wise, a graphical interface could be added for new users, eliminating the need to memorize the complex syntax."

"The solution could be more secure."

More MySQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

"There is not a license required for this solution."

"MySQL is cheaper than Microsoft SQL Server."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"It is open-source."

"I am not paying, but I am not sure about the exact licensing requirements."

"MySQL is free."

"I use a free version at present."

"It's cheaper than other solutions."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 15% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

April 2025

Download Infobright DB product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

April 2025

Download MySQL product report

Also Known As

Infobright

No data available

Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Ignite Technologies

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. MySQL

April 2025

Free Report: Infobright DB vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.