Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Infobright DB Logo

Infobright DB Reviews

Vendor: IgniteTech
3.8 out of 5

What is Infobright DB?

Featured Infobright DB reviews

Infobright DB mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Infobright DB in the Relational Databases Tools category stands at 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infobright DB1.0%
SQL Server11.9%
Oracle Database11.5%
Other75.6%
Relational Databases Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Infobright DB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRelational Databases ToolsMar 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonInfobright DB vs SQL ServerMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonInfobright DB vs Oracle DatabaseMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonInfobright DB vs SAP HANAMar 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Teradata4.13.9%88%83 interviewsAdd to research
SQL Server4.211.9%93%272 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

 
Infobright DB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
MySQL DBA at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees4.0We use Infobright for customer reporting, simplifying our stack from MySQL/Hadoop with its good performance. It's stable and scalable, but we found data replication limitations, requiring self-implemented redundancy, despite excellent support resolving quirks.
Senior System Architect - Resiliency Engineering at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees0.5I found Infobright IEE unstable, with non-existent scalability and a major flaw preventing disk space reduction on deletion. It failed as a big data solution, leading to negative ROI despite its smart grid queries.
Big Data & Business Intelligence Expert5.0I find this solution offers superior ad hoc query performance, fast data loading, and high compression. Its quick setup and low cost are significant advantages, though I'd like to see better distributed processing and Hadoop integration.
Computer Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees2.5I used Infobright for two years as a "BigDataMySql" alternative, avoiding schema changes. It was slow, costly ($25k/year), unstable, and unscalable, only postponing adoption of better solutions. Setup was complex.
Responsabile Area Progetti BI & SYS at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0I love this columnar DB for its compression, efficient queries, and 10x speed boost. Setup is easy, and it's robust. However, complex subqueries cause it to hang, and analytical functions need improvement.
SR Business Intelligence Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0We found Infobright offered fast columnar processing and big data storage with SQL, delivering quick queries and good support. However, its high annual subscription cost forced us to switch back to MS SSAS Tabular Model.
Dynamic and creative, leading a business consultancy practice in analytics, business Intelligence, crm and strategy. at a tech services company with 1-10 employees5.0I've used this reliable, scalable, and easy-to-use solution for six years, finding it an analytics game changer with excellent support and fast time to market. I wish it had more DDL functions.
BI Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I used Infobright Community Edition for three years, valuing its high compression and fast loading. My vendor team learned its implementation with me. The Enterprise version was too expensive just as an addition to my Oracle DWH.