Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MQ
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Business Activity Monitoring (1st), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (1st)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (7th), Relational Databases Tools (10th), Data Warehouse (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of IBM MQ is 24.7%, up from 20.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 5.9%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Message Queue (MQ) Software
 

Featured Reviews

SelvaKumar4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method
We find it scalable for internal applications, but not so much for external integrations. It should support a wider range of protocols, not just a few specific ones. Many other products have broader protocol support, and IBM MQ is lagging in that area. IBM MQ needs to improve the UI for quicker logging. Users should also have a lot more control over logging, with a dashboard-like interface. That's something they should definitely work on.
Sushma Polavarapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges
We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"There is no dependency on the end party service's run status."
"Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ."
"Support for JMS 2.0, because we develop solutions compatible with Java EE7."
"It improves reliability and guarantees that messages are not lost."
"Technical support is quite helpful."
"Integrates between distributed systems: For example, it can help integrate processing between mainframe, client-server, web-based applications by integrating the messages, supporting Service Oriented Architecture."
"The MQ protocol is widely used across multiple applications and it's so simple for connectivity."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The security is great."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database. If you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster. It works on common commodity hardware. You can use any type of server. You don't need to have proprietary hardware. It's fairly flexible."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."
 

Cons

"the level of training as well as product marketing for this product are not that great. You rarely find a good training institute that provides training. Many of the architects in several organization are neither aware of the product nor interested in using it. IBM should provide good training on products like this."
"It could provide more monitoring tools and some improvement to the UI. I would also like to see more throughput in future versions."
"While there is support for API, it's not like the modern API capabilities."
"We need to have a better administration console and better monitoring features. Right now, they are not good and could be a lot better."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"Presenting and maybe having some different options for different user experiences based on the administrative duties that you have to do as an app manager or configure the server or security would be an improvement."
"I believe the stability of the product has decreased since we began using it initially."
"I wanted to upgrade Windows Server. It's not that easy to move."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"Extra filters would be helpful."
"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"Other tools besides RabbitMQ provide good TPS and HA."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is real money involved here. As compared to RabbitMQ, IBM MQ is on the higher side in terms of cost."
"The fee for this solution is on the higher end of the scale."
"We have a special contract with IBM MQ that give us a certain price."
"IBM MQ is an expensive solution compared to other solutions. However, if you pay less you will not receive the same experience or features."
"Licensing for this software is on a yearly basis. The standard fee includes the maintenance and updates that are released periodically."
"I think it's pretty reasonable, but I'm not so too sure of the current pricing strategy from IBM. We use many bundled services, and most often, we go through a service provided by some other third-party implementation. So, I can't really give an honest opinion about that."
"In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side."
"Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run."
"The pricing is okay."
"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
"The price is pretty good."
"It is an open-source product."
"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
38%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
4%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is MQ software?
Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each pro...
What are the differences between Apache Kafka and IBM MQ?
Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data used for analytics. Apache Kafka is very good if you have a high number of user...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
Maintenance is time-consuming. It takes time to VACUUM and ANALYZE the tables to remove the fragmentations.
 

Also Known As

WebSphere MQ
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.